No, it just means that the map data available for the moon is better.
MRO did not yet achieve full coverage BTW.
http://global-data.mars.asu.edu/bin/hirise.pl
Hello, we meet again.:tiphat: You must have known that I am serious (as in the last thread we communicated.) Your serious mentee would like to thank you for sharing with him about MRO data. However, I don't understand why the data looks complete but mentor Urwumpe still says it haven't achieved full coverage. Can you please tell me, mentor?
Your very serious mentee,
Nicholas.
---------- Post added at 01:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:59 PM ----------
Now 54%. 1 hour 47 minutes to go. Extracting at 4.6Mb/s disk drive speed.
You don't have to feel sad. My computer is slow compared to others. I am using APU processor, AMD A6. You don't have to wait and care for me, Enjo. Just do your things and reply others thread as you want. I am ok.
Regards,
Nicholas.
---------- Post added at 01:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:03 PM ----------
Anyway, both of you haven't answered my question. See my previous thread above about microtexture issues.
---------- Post added at 02:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:06 PM ----------
Ok, first clear view of the SLF. Thanks for all. Then, I speed up time. It is in the evening and finally dark. Nom the runway is lit up. But the SLF night texture is very ugly. It is very rough. Hopefully Dr. Martin can rectify the problem before publishing Orbiter Beta 2016 as a standard version.
Anyway, the LandSAT terrain data is impressive. Thanks Dr. Martin and thanks for all. Wait, don't forget my microtexture question. I am waiting for your answer. Please reply as soon as possible.
Thanks.
Regards,
Nicholas