Launch News North Korea successfully shoot satellite into space! December 12, 2012

MaverickSawyer

Acolyte of the Probe
Joined
Apr 11, 2011
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
5
Points
61
Location
Wichita
Yikes! looks like the missile interceptor programs are about to go into high gear...

---------- Post added at 10:25 ---------- Previous post was at 10:20 ----------

Actually, they probably don't yet have a nuke small enough to be be lobbed "anywhere" by their existing launcher. In today's environment, posing a nuclear attack threat takes some more mature technology than 60 years ago. Didn't we watch this launch preparation in almost real time, studying close-up orbital pictures of the pad and the rocket, available to the whole world? How difficult that would be for US navy, to turn the thing into rubble if a slightest sign of a real threat existed?

Have you seen the latest performance on the SM-3 Block II missiles? If they wanted to, they could have swatted it down partway through the third stage burn!
Another option: how much microwave radar power do you think we could put on that target? :) The Japanese and South Koreans both have at least 3 Aegis-equipped ships. That should be enough to seriously degrade the electronics on any rocket that they should launch.
 

Ghostrider

Donator
Donator
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
3,606
Reaction score
2
Points
78
Location
Right behind you - don't look!
Another option: how much microwave radar power do you think we could put on that target? :) The Japanese and South Koreans both have at least 3 Aegis-equipped ships. That should be enough to seriously degrade the electronics on any rocket that they should launch.

You want to topple it?

dr_no_joseph_wiseman1.png


It can be done... For a price.:thumbup:
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,619
Reaction score
2,338
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
Another option: how much microwave radar power do you think we could put on that target? :) The Japanese and South Koreans both have at least 3 Aegis-equipped ships. That should be enough to seriously degrade the electronics on any rocket that they should launch.

No, they should not. Unless you have the radars at point blank range, the rocket would be unaffected. Actually its old military technology, that is made almost immune to strong electromagnetic waves.

The AN/SPY-1 has just 6 MW of power output. if you assume the rocket to be just 100 km away from all three radars at the same time, every square meter of rocket would get only 6 Watt of radiation (Assuming a 30 dB gain of the antenna).
 

orb

New member
News Reporter
Joined
Oct 30, 2009
Messages
14,020
Reaction score
4
Points
0

statickid

CatDog from Deimos
Donator
Joined
Nov 23, 2008
Messages
1,683
Reaction score
4
Points
38
wait! you have to control the spacecraft after it gets into orbit? whaaaaaa????

here is my favorite space news quote at this moment:

The officials said that it is indeed some kind of space vehicle, but they still haven’t been able to determine exactly what the satellite is supposed to do.
 
Last edited:

Loru

Retired Staff Member
Retired Staff
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Messages
3,731
Reaction score
6
Points
36
Location
Warsaw
Probably killrot button didn't work :p

but seriuously even with tumbling satelite they've achieved orbit
 

mojoey

Bwoah
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
3,623
Reaction score
0
Points
61
Where were the origins of the Soviet and American spaceflight programs? Where are the origins of North Korea's?

In the ground...dead...for quite some time.

RIP Robert Goddard.
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,619
Reaction score
2,338
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
Probably killrot button didn't work :p

but seriuously even with tumbling satelite they've achieved orbit

Congratulations, you have produced three more items of space debris with your first orbital launch. Senpai will be pleased.
 
Last edited:

MattBaker

New member
Joined
Jul 9, 2011
Messages
2,750
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Well, what they call tumbling is probably just a missing RCS, huh?

It's probably a simple brick, maybe with a transmitter. The first Soviet and the first American satellites were also not more than this? But we're superior to them...

What really makes me sad is this CNN report, but I guess rocket launches are a lot more awesome than dinner.
 

SiberianTiger

News Sifter
News Reporter
Donator
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
5,398
Reaction score
8
Points
0
Location
Khimki
Website
tigerofsiberia.livejournal.com
But that launched sat is supposed to study the North Polar Cap... Not sure, however, how'd they do that during Northern winter, without any platform stabilization and why do they need these data at all.
 

Spacethingy

Multitasker
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Messages
1,515
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Location
Not the anti-matter universe
Website
spacethingy.weebly.com
Well, what they call tumbling is probably just a missing RCS, huh?

It's probably a simple brick, maybe with a transmitter. The first Soviet and the first American satellites were also not more than this? But we're superior to them...

What really makes me sad is this CNN report, but I guess rocket launches are a lot more awesome than dinner.

1 billion out of a 40 billion economy?! Wow. Out of interest, what kind comparison is that to NASA's budget in the 60's?
 

csanders

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Jan 18, 2012
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Plymouth
1 billion out of a 40 billion economy?! Wow. Out of interest, what kind comparison is that to NASA's budget in the 60's?

Looks like NASA's budget peeked (as a percentage) in '66 at about $6 billion when the GDP was about $750 billion.

[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_of_NASA"]Budget of NASA - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fredgraph.png?g=dLc
 

Pipcard

mikusingularity
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
3,709
Reaction score
38
Points
88
Location
Negishima Space Center
1 billion out of a 40 billion economy?! Wow. Out of interest, what kind comparison is that to NASA's budget in the 60's?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_of_NASA
The highest percentage was 4.41% in 1966.

1/40 = 2.5%, but a lot of North Koreans are starving. I agree that NK should've focused on that first before launching their rocket. Rocket launches are more awesome than dinner, but dinner is vital for living...
 
Last edited:

Mader Levap

New member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Not really. This is not Austin Powers here. Nobody talking to the UN for one million dollar.
Of course this kind of blackmailing is not done like in sensational movies.

Of course, if you claim that they launched it for giggles... oh wait, you are one that laugh.
 

Frogisis

innn spaaaaace...ace...ace...!
Addon Developer
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
Points
31
Location
Chicago
Website
www.frogisis.com
Now that they've discovered that "unicorn lair" under Pyongyang they've probably got their own Laika all lined up, too.
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,619
Reaction score
2,338
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
Of course this kind of blackmailing is not done like in sensational movies.

Of course, if you claim that they launched it for giggles... oh wait, you are one that laugh.

Maybe they launch it for internal propaganda proposes... did you notice that North Korea launched its satellite before South Korea? ;)

:lol:

Also, you are of course aware that a single launch of a single rocket is no threat. Did you notice the large complex launch infrastructure, that we had been better informed about the activities there than many North Koreans? Did you notice that this is just one launch complex?

Even if the North Koreans plan to have an ICBM as option for political negotiations, they would need to launch more of it as training. You can't rely on the only shot you have to go well, if you don't practice it with all effort.
 
Top