Oh, not an image of the planet but a spectrum of the atmosphere... still impressive!
Lot's of water... Miller's planet?
Lot's of water... Miller's planet?
The perfect explanation. Thanks.Pretty much, yeah - along with struts for the secondary mirror (though to a much lesser degree)
Here's an official infographic explaining the diffraction spike pattern on JWST: https://stsci-opo.org/STScI-01G6933BG2JKATWE1MGT1TCPJ9.png

I'm still drooling over this one... ?
I'm still drooling over this one... ?
James Webb is irreversibly damaged by a meteorite impact and will continue to encounter a meteorite every month.
if the Europeans complete their Extremely Large Telescope on time, then this may happen earlierNothing and no one is eternal. Webb has a service life like any satellite or space probe and in a decade or two will likely become another piece of space junk, yes, but until then it works as expected and will collect a huge lot of extremely valuable data.
It's not designed for that. Various lunar probes over the years gave us excellent optical and radar already. And we know what to expect on the surface, 6 Apollo missions landed on various sites.So how far can the telescope see? Can it see the surface of the moon, much clearer.