I mistakenly assumed you meant "best" flight path for all countries involved. Instead what you meant was the best flight path for N. Korea to succeed in getting to space - completely disregarding foreign opinion and safety of foreign civilian populations. How this is deemed "responsible" and "sensible" by you completely baffles me.
I suggest you learn a little more about it then. I also suggest you reread my post. I said they did everything right in
appearing to be a responsible launch nation. They notified the right people and said the right things, they played it by the book. This doesn't mean they are responsible, just that they didn't want any additional problems over what would already be caused by launching in the direction of Japan.
Also, which particular flightpath could they have taken that wouldn't have reduced their standing in foreign opinion? I can't find one. There is no way to launch anything from N.K without passing over someone, and passing over Japan is the most efficient way, and results in a lot less problems than launching over China or S.K
[quoye]Am I angry? Yes. It happens when rogue nations launch experimental weapons platforms over my family's heads, dropping stages off both coasts. The buildup of materials and technology for WMD on the Korean penninsula is a serious matter for us that live here. What do you expect? Joy? Indifference even?[/quote]
Calmness. Getting worked up about things doesn't make them any better. Also, the flightpath of some (but not many) Chinese launches takes them over Japan, is this a problem for you?
It's unfortunate that you prefer to regard the whole affair as a curious science experiment - even amusing for you as evidenced by your parade of smiley faces and multiple comments made in jest. Forgive me if I don't laugh.
This is at heart a scientific forum. If it were a political forum then I'd talk more about the politics, but here I think we can have a better discussion on the actual launch vehicle and flight itself, rather than discussing for the nth time how N.K is a danger to us all.
And yes, I do find it amusing. It is pretty amusing how worked up a lot of people seem to be over this launch. It demonstrates nothing new, it doesn't pose much of a threat to Japan (malfunctions aside). The Japanese posturing was, in my opinion, just a show of force in an attempt to exercise some control over N.K. That posturing failed and N.K is probably quite happy about that. This was a pure propaganda exercise for both sides, and it seems to me to be quite clear who got the greater benefit from it.
Do they need to actually fire off anything to check their capability for intercept?
The fact that someone could've intercepted that missile is pretty straightforward. As you say, tracking it generates a lot more usable data than blowing it out the sky, and generates a hell of a lot less political repercussions.
IMHO, the orbital insertion path wouldn't have mattered a bit of difference because they were merely putting up a propaganda radio satellite.
Well it does matter, their launch vehicle isn't exactly beefy so they need a pretty efficient trajectory to even get into orbit (assuming that's what they were doing), and seeing as how they're going to piss someone off no matter where they launch it then they might as well take one of the more efficient trajectories available to them.
Btw, what's their ePeen? Haven't heard that expression before.