If you added an attachment point in the vessel's config file, wouldn't that enable you to grab it with a UMMU?
FWIW, having the vehicle manoeuvre away from the sat is not unusual. It was certainly done that way with HST on the servicing missions (Hubble has no RCS at all) and IIRC even IUS launched sats required a separation burn by the orbiter after the initial spring separation.I think it will be much nicer to move the stack away from the HyperDart than moving the HyperDart![]()
When you experienced that did you create the HyperDart on obit through the scenario editor? I have only experienced that type of rotation when fuel tank 1 is full (it might be tank 0, it is the first one in the menu), like it would be with a dart created with the scenario editor. If that is the case put the level of fuel tank 1 down to 10% or less like it would be if you flew it to orbit and the RCS should work fine. That main tank is 280000kg if memory serves right and is about 80% of a fully loaded hyperdart.
Let me know, thanks!
the HD itself only has the problem with RCS when in LEO, on upper orbits, the RCS autopilot seems to work much finer
my comments:
the XL70 autopilot is certainly a disaster when you try to state its heading as well (aap.hdg)