Rtyh-12
Member
Cooperation would of course be neat, but as this guy doesn't want to work with Face, then a competition is the next best thing. Anyway, let's stop off-topic posting here...
In the case of orbiter, I'd prefer to see co-operation instead of competition. With co-operation many different ideas can be put into one super-sonic-stellar package. Also less chance for two standards to be developed. Orbiter is complex enough as it is!
It will always be like that. Just imagine someone is fed up with Dan's OrbiterSound and writes another sound framework...
I hate forks... bruised egos, and introduction of new bugs... Rewriting from a clean slate is IMHO better since it frees the architect from the fetters of the old design (while also tempting him with shiny new features, to be honest).
Except not.
Simple example:
Server is running at 1x time accel. I'm standing at KSC at 8am in the morning, local KSC time. I time-accelerate to move forward a total of 10 hours and 1 minute in sim-time, taking only 1 minute in real-time, so the server now thinks it's 8:01am and I think it's 6:01pm.
How then do you resolve all of the differences between me and the server? For me, the Earth has moved 10 hours further along its orbit, so if you just transmit my coordinates to the server (as you suggest), I'll be floating in space at a point the Earth won't reach for another ten hours. If you synchronize with the planet (so I remain stationary at KSC), I will have seen the sun move almost completely across the sky. When I get re-synchronized to the server, the sun will jump from an hour or so before sunset to a couple hours after sunrise.
The moon and ISS will be different places than they were a moment before, which makes things like rendeszvous impossible (I time accel to orbit and catch the ISS, then turn off time accel and the ISS will be in a completely different place).
How is this even remotely a good illusion or "immersive"?
Try playing FSX and pausing or slewing, you'll see their aircraft is just staying there in the air, 20 minutes passes by, 2 planes pass over it, the time changes on the server along with the client.
My explanation is totally worth a <img src="images/smilies/facepalm.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Facepalm" smilieid="169" class="inlineimg" />
<p></p>
<p> </p>
<p>FSX doesn't have to deal with orbital mechanics. When you pause in FSX multiplayer, you're not actually stopping time...you're just stopping all your movement and hanging stationary at a given point above the ground. When you resume, you'll continue with whatever velocity you had before. This works fine for FSX, which has a global constant reference point that you can kill motion relative to (the ground) without impacting your flight path relative to the ground. Orbiter has no such reference point--if you kill motion relative to the Sun, the other bodies will continue moving, so your carefully plotted course is now worthless.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The closest analogue in terms of FSX multiplayer would be an aircraft carrier--if you have an aircraft carrier steaming along, and you're set up for a perfect final approach to it, then pause...the aircraft carrier will keep moving away from you, since you've killed your motion relative to the earth (but not relative to the ship). When you resume from pause, the aircraft carrier will no longer be in front of you, and your perfect landing will turn into a go-around or a long swim.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Make sense?</p>
<p> Yeah, I get it now.</p>
<p> :lol: </p>
Apparently editing a post from the mobile skin doesn't work too well, fixed now, thanksall those <p>'s are supposed to be Cheshire <g>'s...
It appears I missed all the awesome theoretical discussions by about 2 weeks
Instead of having other users in other craft, would it be possible to have another player as passenger in a craft?
*yelling at the pilot* HEY! Do you mind,Im trying to sleep back here!You can join as observer and use a server command to register to a craft. You will then see everything this vessel sees, F3 to it, and take seat somewhere in the passenger area. It is funny to watch a flight from a passenger seat.
Multiplayer via two people at the same computer hasn't really been supported by complex games in like a decade...I would love a multiplayer version where you put two joysticks at the computer and fly with splitscreen.