Breaking the light barrier dosnt meen fast you could go like 1 nanometer faster than c and its still aint going to matter.Then it still doesn't mean much. If you're breaking the light speed barrier, well, even 90% of C is then slow...
Breaking the light barrier dosnt meen fast you could go like 1 nanometer faster than c and its still aint going to matter.Then it still doesn't mean much. If you're breaking the light speed barrier, well, even 90% of C is then slow...
Breaking the light barrier dosnt meen fast you could go like 1 nanometer faster than c and its still aint going to matter.
I guess this would be a good place to ask this; if there were two Hubbles (or whatever the next large, space-based telescope is), and they were placed in solar orbit, one ahead of Earth by six months, one behind Earth six months, so that the distance between them was approx. 186 million miles, would there be an advantage to the 'stereoscopic' view that provided?
Ahem... one nanometer/second faster than c is still faster than c. And it is still superlumuinal. 0.1 c is subluminal.
Even without the blatant physics issues, 1 nanometer/second faster than c is still extremely fast...
OH yeah i just remembered relativity issues
Y'know, I don't think it's economic reasons as much as it's political reasons. There is plenty enough money, it's just that nobody is really willing to spend it.
It's important to recognise that the annual defence budget of the USA is a probably more than even the most blatantly expensive Mars mission eventualities...
I guess this would be a good place to ask this; if there were two Hubbles (or whatever the next large, space-based telescope is), and they were placed in solar orbit, one ahead of Earth by six months, one behind Earth six months, so that the distance between them was approx. 186 million miles, would there be an advantage to the 'stereoscopic' view that provided?/QUOTE]
You could have 3d view of stuff, although I'm not really sure how much advantage this would give, because you could simply wait until the Earth is on the other side. Also, I guess you mean that one probe is 6 months in front of the other, because the way you suggested it, they would be both exactly in the same spot.
Back on topic, I would really like to see the manned Mars landing, and a thorough exploration of Europa would be nice too...
Urwumpe said:Relativity comes in play, when you try to calculate how long you need to accelerate to exceed c.
Which is impossible anyway, so we are talking nonsense anyway.
the first manned Jupiter landing?
Good luck with that! Make sure your GP Hull is fully sealed!the first manned Jupiter landing?
WOW you got a really good education there:rofl:the first manned Jupiter landing?
WOW you got a really good education there:rofl:
I SAY the best scenario ever and the greatest achievement humanity will do any time soon...
LUNAR WARFARE
I really want to see a war on the moon
I really don't know what to say to that comment. I wouldn't know what to say to a comment about lunar warfare, and I wouldn't know what to say to a comment about wanting to see a war...