News ROSAT falls from the sky

T.Neo

SA 2010 Soccermaniac
Addon Developer
Joined
Jun 22, 2008
Messages
6,368
Reaction score
0
Points
0
It is a 1:2000 chance that a single human between 53° North and 53° South is hit by debris. About 5 billion people together bring 1:2,000.

Does that take into account differences in population density over the potential impact area?
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,742
Reaction score
2,485
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
Does that take into account differences in population density over the potential impact area?

Why should it? It is too early to exclude place from the region so ALL people between 53°N and 53°S are included. It is 1:2000 that a single person of all these people is hit. Regardless if he lives alone in a cave (ok, maybe he has a better chance) or lives in a big city.
 

george7378

DON'T PANIC
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Jun 26, 2009
Messages
1,045
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Got a picture of ROSAT last summer (completely by chance) when it did an unpredicted flare in the sky:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/georgekristiansen/5309957517/

Sent it to a Max-Planck-Institut scientist and he did some analysis and got this:

rflare_.jpg


...so it was tumbling quite a bit even in August 2010. It'll be interesting to see what it does now - there are a few good passes over the UK in the coming weeks.
 

agentgonzo

Grounded since '09
Addon Developer
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
4
Points
38
Location
Hampshire, UK
Website
orbiter.quorg.org
Simple: First, a nuke has the much simpler trajectory. It flies only 25 minutes, and generally tries to aim for a point 90° around Earth from its launch site, so the errors are further minimized.

Next, it has an aerodynamically defined and stable shape with its spinning reentry vessel, while the satellite is complex and tumbling.

This is both also augmented by the fact, that the reentry angle of the satellite is close to zero, while a nuclear warhead reenters at more than 9°, which means the warhead has approximately a straight line during its ballistic reentry from entry interface to impact (Since it never again reaches a place where gravity dominates over aerodynamic forces).
Also, Nukes are actively steered all the way down to the ground by the on-board controls.
 

RisingFury

OBSP developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
6,427
Reaction score
492
Points
173
Location
Among bits and Bytes...
A 1.7 t mirror? Wow, that's seven years of major bad luck to whomever it falls onto, and gets broken on.

Not quite...

It's not a typical mirror that you'd see in an optical telescope - ball or parabolic shape. X-rays have the unfortunate quality of passing right though everything, so you can only refract them if you do so at very low angles. The technique is called grazing.

grazing2D-72.gif
 

T.Neo

SA 2010 Soccermaniac
Addon Developer
Joined
Jun 22, 2008
Messages
6,368
Reaction score
0
Points
0
RisingFury brought up an idea for such an X-ray mirror as a radiation shield for HVIPS. :hmm:


If I remember correctly, he also squashed the idea with some maths... :lol:
 

RisingFury

OBSP developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
6,427
Reaction score
492
Points
173
Location
Among bits and Bytes...
Would have been too heavy.

The best idea for shielding I still have is bending of light. If you pass light through two slits, you get places where light is intensified and in other places where the interference is destructive and light cancels out. If you play with the geometry enough, you can put your crew into one of those shadows.
 

RisingFury

OBSP developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
6,427
Reaction score
492
Points
173
Location
Among bits and Bytes...
Nice! Practical useage of the double slit experiment FTW.

One of my favorite versions is the so called Fresnel bending lens.

fresnel.gif

1.jpg


Instead of the slits being straight, they're circular. The light (waves) focus into a point and into circles around the point.

I didn't do the experiment with x-rays, but I did do it with ultrasound. It was lots of fun.
 
Top