Huh? How do you treat one without the other?
Well, we spent months talking about Nazi youth organizations, discrimnation against Jews etc. in the period of '33 to '39.
"Then a war happened, Germany lost and, oh, there was a holocaust." In roughly that length.
But on the other hand you learn about it in every subject. You learn about the Third Reich in history, you learn about Nazi-friendly music in music, you learn about (anti) Nazi-literature in German classes, you learn about Nazi art in art classes (where I learned Hitler was a worse painter than I am
And in all that hundreds of hours about Nazi topics you never talked about why it was wrong and why people still followed it or that a lot of people thought exactly like that. You just talked about it believing there was a consensus how bad this time was and how none of us would follow something like that, while I'm quite sure this consensus was only imagined and a lot would do the same like people did in '33. And antisemitism in other nations wasn't even mentioned. Sure, Germany did the most terrible thing but that was too much black/white for me, I wouldn't fully accept a nation which kills millions of Jews just like I would say a nation which bans Jewish lawyers/doctors was wrong although they weren't lead by Hitler.
It's like reading only the war passages of "Im Westen nichts Neues", in the end you'll get students who believe this was a totally awesome, über-cool war trip where you were allowed to ram a bayonet in someone's rip cage and then it was over again and everyone was happy.
Sorry for the rant, but IMO this kind of education has at least a few arrows in the knee.
!
