Big deal. Only fanatics are going to install a new OS on their computer that will be disabled in the near future, just so they can determine whether it sucks less than Vista.
I was amused when I went to buy a laptop after I moved to Canada, because my desktop PC was on a boat somewhere in the middle of the Atlantic; at pretty much every computer store I went to sales people were telling me _not_ to buy Vista, even though most stores didn't even sell XP laptops anymore and the few XP laptops which were available were typically half the price of the Vista ones and probably had substantially lower profit margins.
When even the people selling computers, who stand to make more money by selling Vista to me, think it sucks, Microsoft have a real problem.
Win7 is not Vista. If you don't believe me, try it.
No, as I said, it's Vista 1.1.
You're not seriously claiming you believe the Microsoft have developed a complete new OS in two years, are you?
Microsoft is talking about Windows 8? What? Where? Development has most certainly not started on a next version.
Maybe you should keep up with the news: there have been several articles in the last week about 'Windows 8' and Microsoft hiring developers for it. This isn't the 90s anymore... my XP desktop has lasted six years; why would I want to have to pay to install a new OS on my PC every two years?
Wait what? Did you not read the part where several features of Win7 were based on what customers want?
Wow, several new features! Stop the press!
What the majority of Microsoft's customers want is... XP. They don't want to have to buy a super-fast system just to run the operating system, nor do they want to be forced to pay money to replace it with software which gives them no perceived benefit and requires massive retraining costs if they're using it in a business environment.
I honestly see no reason whatsoever to install anything beyond XP on my computers; Vista (and Vista 1.1) provide nothing new that I want, yet Microsoft persist in trying to push it on me if I want to run Windows programs.
Plus, how is Windows an "abomination"? (which, btw, is "anything abominable; anything greatly disliked or abhorred"). Seems like 90% of PC users are using Windows, which would hardly make it "greatly disliked or abhorred."
What's Microsoft's marketing tactic for every new version of Windows?
'Buy Windows X+1! This is the version of Windows that doesn't suck, unlike Windows X. Ok, we told you that Windows X was the version of Windows that didn't suck, unlike Windows X-1, but this time we really mean it!'
Come on, even Microsoft use their own products' failings as a marketing ploy to try to get people to buy the next version. And you don't think it's an abomination full of half-developed APIs and vast swathes of junk that's in there purely for backtwards compatibility?
I'm sorry, but I've spent years working with the internals of Windows, and the whole thing is an absolute disaster zone. And that's merely the operating system, even before we start on the garbage that's pushed on users from applications (e.g. every program wanting to start up some piece of crap 'update manager' when you boot so that you can't even use your system for two minutes or more after logging in).
This specific feature does not "go looking for [your images] for" you. It only shows you files and folders in the exact set of places you tell it to look
Then, uh, what's the point?
Microsoft tried to force people to put all their pictures into 'My Pictures', and then discovered that people don't want to do that. Why do they think that people who don't want to put their pictures there are suddenly going to go through the hassle of telling it where to go looking for the pictures they do have, so they can be put in a 'My Pictures' folder that they're not using?
You know why I don't put my pictures in 'My Pictures'?
Because of the freaking antiquated 1980s drive letter nonsense, and the way that Windows wants to put all user documents and all applications and the operating system all on the c: drive. You run out of space there and you buy a new drive to store your data on... and... uh... oh... but Microsoft want it to all go in 'My Documents', which is stuck on the c: drive. So you're stuffed.
And you don't think Windows is an abomination?
(And yes, I know that in theory you can move an individual users' files to a different hard drive, but doing so is vastly beyond the capability of the average user: even I couldn't get it to work in XP, particularly as so many applications ignore the settings and assume they can just use the normal path on c:\)
Seriously, I can barely stand to use Windows anymore: if it wasn't for the fact that I have numerous games and a few multi-thousand-dollar applications that are Windows-only, I'd wave bye-bye to Microsoft for good. I will celebrate the day I can toss the last Windows PC out of my house.
You know, I remember a time when ATMs didn't crash, or come up with a screen asking me to press Ok to close the current application. I remember a time when you could go to an airport and actually see the flights listed on the displays, rather than a blue-screen crash dump.
A while back someone actually asked me why we use Linux for this system I'm installing, and not Windows. Substantial downtime could cost customers millions of dollars, inconvenience large numbers of people and put thousands of lives at risk, and we're going to run it on... Windows?