- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 14,020
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 0
Aviation Week: Futron Study: U.S. Losing Ground In Space
Senators who agree that NASA is taking too long to develop a design and procurement strategy for the heavy-lift Space Launch System (SLS) that Congress ordered last year cannot agree among themselves on exactly what that design should be.
At issue is what kind of power will be used in the strap-on boosters needed to get the SLS off the pad, pitting powerful senators from both sides of the aisle against members of their own political parties in a letter-writing campaign to the executive branch aimed at generating jobs for their constituents.
{...}
Already facing the possibility of deep cuts in its FY 2012 budget, NASA’s financial prospects have become increasingly bleaker over the past week on several fronts, including further reductions and large costs in two high-profile programs.
Last Wednesday, the Office of Management and Budget sent out a memorandum to all federal departments asking them to plan for reductions when preparing their FY 2013 requests:
Unless your agency has been given explicit direction otherwise by OMB, your overall agency request for 2013 should be at least 5 percent below your 2011 enacted discretionary appropriation. As discussed at the recent Cabinet meetings, your 2013 budget submission should also identify additional discretionary funding reductions that would bring your request to a level that is at least 10 percent below your 2011 enacted discretionary appropriation.
NASA received $18.45 billion in the current fiscal year. A five percent reduction would put spending at $17.52 billion; a 10 percent cut would leave the space agency with $16.6 billion. It is not known whether NASA received “explicit direction otherwise” to ignore the budget guidance.
{...}
NASA has released the executive summary of Booz Allen Hamilton’s independent analysis of the Space Launch System (SLS), Multi-purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV) and the required ground systems. The review says that near-term cost estimates are fairly reasonable, but that longer-term cost figures are overly optimistic and that programs reserves are insufficient.
{...}
NASA Administrator Charles Bolden has asked outgoing space shuttle Program Manager John Shannon to carry out an independent assessment of competing options for eventual manned missions beyond low-Earth orbit, officials say. The review will include input from NASA's international partners to align "our efforts with the international space community," Bolden said in a letter to senior NASA managers.
{...}
Bolden said NASA is not yet "choosing a mission plan that the agency is going to implement at this time. Rather, we are Identifying potential human exploration scenarios on the horizon, so that we can most productively guide our approved efforts in the near-term, while aligning our efforts with the international space community."
{...}
Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) and Bill Nelson (D-FL) issued the following statement:
“A just-completed, NASA-commissioned independent cost assessment by Booz Allen Hamilton found that development of the Space Launch System, Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and complementary ground system was feasible within authorized funding levels and timelines. This was expected; NASA experts had verified and re-verified estimated costs several times.
Rather than announce these results and move forward with development, the administration’s budget office has kept the independent cost report under wraps. Instead, a wildly inflated set of NASA cost numbers was invented, based on an imaginary “acceleration” of SLS development. Under these contrived numbers, which were leaked in yesterday’s Wall Street Journal, development costs were forecast to increase to $57 billion – nearly double the amount that NASA and Booz Allen Hamilton agreed would be needed in the independent cost assessment.
No one has proposed to accelerate development. We and others have – repeatedly – demanded that the administration’s budget office simply follow the development plan that the President signed into law last year. It has been validated repeatedly, internally and externally (including the OMB requested Booz Allen Hamilton report), as a sound approach for going forward and maintaining our leadership in manned space exploration. Accelerated development is a convenient myth. The White House should proceed immediately according to the reasonable, achievable development timetable embedded in federal law, and preserve America’s pre-eminence in space.”
O-F Staff Note: three off-topic posts removed. Let's please stay on-topic in this thread. Thanks.
For example off-topic are comments about (quality of) content of this thread (and someone announcing here that stopped posting because of that), and replies to those comments, as also your reply to the O-F staff note and my reply to your post now.What does and does not constitute "on-topic" in this thread? :shifty:
NASA will raise the curtain today on the long-awaited design of a super-sized rocket that will propel U.S. astronauts to an asteroid by 2025 and then missions to Mars in the following decade, senior Obama administration officials told FLORIDA TODAY.
{...}