Again, read about the historic component, instead of thinking only in the geographic dimension (Was done in Alaska, Palin is governor of Alaska, so Palin must have done it). Between 1977 and 2006, Palin was not governor. Do you honestly think, that she had any serious negotiations in these final 1.5 years?
I really don't know the historical details. I expect that acquiring a full understanding of them, would be
very effort-intensive and time consuming - requiring, among other things, an examination of the recorded minutes of each and every meeting involving anyone who participated in the process. I regard it as a pointless exercise, to attempt to define precisely what Palin's activities were, in that regard, and quantify the extent to which each action contributed to the overall result. It is sufficient to recognize that she participated in the process and completed it, successfully.
Furthermore, your assertion was that "being Governor of Alaska obviously does not come with great skills should be obvious."
Whichever Governor(s) may have participated in the process, in whatever specific manner and to whatever precise extent, your assertion is refuted by any ability to recognize that the establishment of the pipeline was a complex and significant function performed by the Alaska Governor.
Thanks for the links, but it looks like my English isn't good enough to understand the difference between "...I don't support..." and "...will not find my support...", also I can't imagine what "non-explicit sex-ed" might be
From the L.A. Times article:
But in August of that year, Palin was asked during a KTOO radio debate if "explicit" programs include those that discuss condoms. Palin said no and called discussions of condoms "relatively benign."
"Explicit means explicit," she said. "No, I'm pro-contraception, and I think kids who may not hear about it at home should hear about it in other avenues. So I am not anti-contraception. But, yeah, abstinence is another alternative that should be discussed with kids. I don't have a problem with that. That doesn't scare me, so it's something I would support also."
I, also, don't know what would distinguish Palin's definitions of "explicit sex-ed" and "non-explicit sex-ed." Perhaps among her considerations, would be the inclusion of helpful advice on enjoyable sodomy techniques, that has been reported as being included in some school presentations. The point is, that Palin is evidently not opposed to school sex-ed, generally, and is not opposed to the inclusion in it, of discussions about contraception, and is not insistent upon school sex-ed's being "abstinence, only," and is, evidently, not the rabidly religious opponent of school sex-ed, that would constitute the "myth" about her.
. 
