I'm guessing it slips later in the week
So far seems on track, booster's in place and ship is loaded and expected to roll out today.
Anyway, "details" on what happened with Flight 8 (details is a very strong word here):
SpaceX designs, manufactures and launches advanced rockets and spacecraft.
www.spacex.com
Stating the issue with F8 was distinct from F7 (and that the F7 fixes worked), but the wording is also curious (until it failed they worked? lol). And feels like there's a lot of missing info anyway, not really describing root causes.
And Flight 9 plans:
SpaceX designs, manufactures and launches advanced rockets and spacecraft.
www.spacex.com
TL;DR booster to be expended due to higher risk from reuse, using it to test more aggressive angle of attack during descent, intentionally disabling a centre engine for landing to test a middle ring compensating for it, and then going down to two engines for the "catch". Ship plan unchanged.
Interesting tidbit on the booster flip:
"Following stage separation, the booster will flip in a controlled direction before initiating its boostback burn. This will be achieved by blocking several of the vents on the vehicle’s hotstage adapter, causing the thrust from Starship’s engines to push the booster in a known direction. Previous booster flips went in a randomized direction based on a directional push from small differences in thrust from Starship’s upper stage engines at ignition. Flipping in a known direction will require less propellant to be held in reserve, enabling the use of more propellant during ascent to enable additional payload mass to orbit."
I'd think they have the ability to know the ignition stagger on the ship and thus where torque would show up first, instead of requiring the booster to react in real time, not that it's a bad capability to have.