- Joined
- May 14, 2008
- Messages
- 10,547
- Reaction score
- 347
- Points
- 158
- Location
- East Sussex
- Website
- blog.gdwnet.com
- Preferred Pronouns
- He/Him
You do not see ion and plasma engine programs being scrapped, since they seem to be the future
If so, why has the NASA breakthrough propulsion physics department been closed?
It means no flights for some time. But in a time of economic constraints making the best use of money seems a must. I think that space shuttle program was a political thing. Shuttle existed to go to ISS and ISS existed so shuttle could have a destination. Beautiful birds, but what a waste of money!
Shuttle existed long before ISS. Only 33 of it's 130+ missions have been to ISS. Where would you put the money from shuttle? Health care? DoD? NASA's entire budget is some 0.8% of the total GDP of the USA.
If you attach a plasma engine to ISS, you could bump it up when needed, and also you could change orbit inclination to make it usable as a first stop for resupply/refuel for interplanetary trips. The good news is that ISS produces hydrogen as waste, and that's exactly what plasma engine needs as propellant.
Studies show that to get plasma working on ISS will require 200KW of power. That's the same as all four solar arrays at max power. What do you use for the lights?
Changing inclination will take decades and for what? It's no good as a fuel depot. Also to get a fuel depot operation you need to solve the issue of Hydrogen boil off.