- Joined
- Feb 8, 2008
- Messages
- 1,649
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 38
- Location
- Hampshire, UK
- Website
- orbiter.quorg.org
I've been lurking in the wings following the OFMM sporadically. Arrowstar, here are my comments on your Tech Memo:
---------- Post added at 14:39 ---------- Previous post was at 14:23 ----------
Also, just noticed that there is some disparity between the final satellite positions for OFMM7 and 8. The main mission assignment page states that OFMM7 will place them at 0, 60, 120 and OFMM8 will do it at 180, 240, 300, whereas you state OFMM7 at 0, 120, 240 and OFMM8 at 60, 180, 300. I agree with this latter plan as a failure of any one mission will mean that you do not lose coverage for half the planet. Maybe the main mission assignment page should be updated?
- Does 'DSCS' stand for 'Deep space communications satellite'? If so, saying 'DSCS Communication satellites' is redundant.
- Add a note to state the altitude of the aerostationary orbit (17,000 km).
- Are the three DSCSs to be spaced out 120° around the planet? If so, say so
- Give launch windows (with a nominal T0 time) rather than exact launch times
- Plan some nominal DSMs (deep space manoeuvres) for mid course corrections and give them nominal dates and times. Extra ones can be added in if the trajectory is way off, but better to have burns at expected times rather than willy-nilly. You can always have 'DSM2 not required' in the mission log if the course correction burn was not required due to excellent piloting.
- Is there a name/designator for the vessel that'll carry the DSCSs rather than 'DSCS vehicle' - think of the way that NASA referred to Apollo CSM or Centaur booster for missions rather than 'vehicle'
- Use terminology 'nominal' rather than 'preferred' when talking about orbits
radius/altitude. That makes it sound like you'd planned the mission, rather than just letting the pilots wing it. - Give rough (or even accurate) timescales for orbital insertion timescales.
- There seems to be some inconsistency in the final orbits of the DSCSs. You have said that they are aerostationary with an inclination of 45°. Did you mean aerosynchronous? Stationary orbits can only ever be of 0°inc
- There is no plan in the memo for when and how to separate the 3 DSCSs per mission to insert them into their separate orbits.
- OFMM 14-17:
- Do not let the throttle-jockeys pick their launch times. All important mission times should be nominally selected by the trajectory boffins
- OFMM 33 - is 300x300km a little low? Think of how often the ISS gets reboosted, which is at an altitude higher than this. Will there be missions to reboost the James Cook or will it use its own power to do this? Is it more fuel efficient to use a higher parking orbit and not have to continually reboost?
---------- Post added at 14:39 ---------- Previous post was at 14:23 ----------
Also, just noticed that there is some disparity between the final satellite positions for OFMM7 and 8. The main mission assignment page states that OFMM7 will place them at 0, 60, 120 and OFMM8 will do it at 180, 240, 300, whereas you state OFMM7 at 0, 120, 240 and OFMM8 at 60, 180, 300. I agree with this latter plan as a failure of any one mission will mean that you do not lose coverage for half the planet. Maybe the main mission assignment page should be updated?