Indeed. However, the 'evidence' used by the article in the first post was in Arabic.
Still, the 'evidence' (which is just a hypothesis) is getting more and more real evidence, the most amusing the helpless confession of the guardian council, that Ahmadinejad got only 3 million votes more in the rather Ahmadinejad critical cities, than there had been citizens.
The only way to stop these protests now, would be violence - there is no successful peaceful end for it. These people can't constructively agree on how the new government should look like, they only know what they currently don't want. As such, it has many parallels to the French revolution, which did not prevent France from becoming a monarchy (or worse) again. It is just the second step towards a stable constitution. Only god knows how many steps it will take. Ahmadinejad and Khamenei have not yet lost, but also have not yet won. The things could still turn out like in China or the GDR (17th June 1953), with military crushing the protests with really brute force. The GDR did also not collapse for 35 years after violently stopping the protests. I doubt you can build a wall around Iran to lock the people inside it, so it will sure not be the same afterwards. The brain drain that will result though, will be painful. Currently Iran has a very good science system, not far behind first world nations, which enables it to do serious work, not just the copy and paste jobs of the real "rogue" nations, like NK or Lybia (in the past. Now they play nice and benevolent).
Yes, maybe I am pessimistic with my assessment, but I don't think this "revolution" will come. The protesters would also need a long-term goal to achieve after disposing the criminals and gaining the desired liberties (and they can't even agree, what liberties they want). Who will have most to win and most to lose will be the women in Iran. They had been the most focussed force in the days before the elections and are especially active now. Which I consider the key factor - the women will likely define what could come afterwards, because you can't ignore them currently. You don't need to be a women rights advocate to predict that, most of their political goals are pretty pragmatic anyway. Also, Iran is not Saudi-Arabia, the women in Iran have already a much stronger position in the political life there, as in other arabian countries.
Their definition of equality is also not really extreme: "In the years after the islamic revolution, it was possible for women to candidate for presidency, today it is not. This is not the Iran we fought for."