- Joined
- May 30, 2008
- Messages
- 5,580
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 0
It's not uncommon to want to include bits of the plane when placing cameras to record in-flight video.Correct me if I am wrong, but the center of the camera FOV is not straight ahead, it is also too far angled to be just misaligned.
The only one coming up with complicated hypothetical reasons for anything is you. I gave you the exact reason, according to the pilot, why the camera was there. You're running off making stuff up to suit your fancy.The question is not, if there could be a complicated, hypothetical reason why this camera is there.
Why would you position a camera to not record action? They wanted to film their 15-minute flight to Lakeland, so they stuck a camera in the back of the plane. What's so hard to believe about that? People record themselves flying all the time, just go browse youtube for flying videos. There are thousands upon thousands, and I've even uploaded one.Or why a camera was filming the crew at the same time. They are there. As they are, they are positioned for filming the action.
:facepalm:There are countless reasons why they could be there, but only one that has no "hypothetical entities":
What about the whole stunt being done for a movie or TV production? Thought of it? Ok, the name of the production would still be a hypothetical entity. But the available pieces fit.
No, I hadn't thought of it, because it's absurd. The only pieces that "fit" are the ones you've made up. There are simple, reasonable explanations for everything that happens in this video that don't require making stuff up, imagining things, or assuming that two high-time professional pilots are willing to put their lives and careers on the line for a minute-long video.
Moreover, if this were a stunt for a movie or TV production, I challenge you to find the movie or TV show it was used in or for. You're arguing from baseless assumptions. I've been arguing from facts and actually looking things up. Why don't you try it sometime?