Thanks a lot for your reply. I'm delighted to contribute to a model that I really like and has a lot of fun potential for the simulation.
I tried to look at this issue more carefully:
=========================================================================
Bill Gunston Military Helicopters Salamander
Height 5,67m
Total Length 26.97m
Main Rotor 21.95m
www.aviastar.org/helicopters_eng/sik_s64.php
Height 5,67m
Fuselage Length 21.41m
===================================================================
Calc to Main Rotor
Main Rotor Center (no point ) = -3.038894E-02 2.5716 4.232673
Main Rotor Extremity MAINBLADE16 = -12.45339 2.5369 0.060098
Distance = 13.1050578616573
Rotor total diam. =26.21011572
Factor = 0.837
Calc to Fuselage Height Including gear
Top: Mesh6 326 = 0.12898 3.2733 -13.316
Bottom: Mesh24 0 = -2.9718 -4.7588 2.3642
Dist(Y) = 8.0321
Factor =0705917506
Calc to Total Height including secondary rotor
Top
Secondary Rotor Center :-0.1583891 2.640247 -12.64978
Secondary Rotor Extremity: -0.1583891 4.721379 -13.64622
Secondary Rotor Radius: 2.30738013231977
Top: ( Y Secondary Rotor Center )+ (Secondary Rotor Radius) =2.640247+2.30738013231977= 4.947627132
Bottom: Mesh24 0 = -2.9718 -4.7588 2.3642
Dist(Y) = 9.706427132
Factor = 0.58414903 (????)
Calc to Fuselage Length
Front: Mesh6 1565 = 0.173 -2.1058 13.881
Back Mesh6 800 = 0.16346 2.7975 -13.958
Dist(Z) =27.839
Factor = 0.76906
Calc to Total Length including main rotor and secondary rotor
Front: (Z Rotor Center) + (Rotor Radius) = 4.232673 + 13.1050578616573 = 17.33773086
Back ( Z Secondary Rotor Center )+ (Secondary Rotor Radius) = -12.64978 - 2.30738 = -14.95716
Dist(Z) = 32.3344686
Factor = 0.834094425
At this time I was completely lost so I decided to take a look at some photos and check proportions. One thing that called my attention is that for people next to the cockpit , the tops of their heads match the bottom edge of the front-side-bottom cockpit window.
Considering an UMMU civilian model ( which is quite accurate) this condition is achieved with the .7059 scaling. I wasn't so lucky to find a suitable reference for the length but, after some trials, it seemed to me that the better option is to take for the length (Z axis) the calculated value of .769 and ensure the model fits prototype listed dimensions. Also seems to look better this way.
When these options are assumed it feels to me that, for the X axis, the .769 scaling gives a proportion that ( visually and intuitively) matches the blueprints better.
Best Regards and Happy New Year
BEEP
PS Once you're already reworking the model, check if the center origin of the mesh is correctly placed at the CG of the helicopter. It seems to me that the CG should be in front of the rear gear, probably around the main rotor Z pos.