Excellent, thanks all for this sample!
I use 1920x1200 exclusively. You might want to create a poll to better organize results.
It is a good suggestion, and it did cross my mind, but decided that I did not want to "channel" the results into my preferences.
Thank you for that lead...
...Is this for some Orbiter 2D panel?
Yes, 2D panels. The idea is based on the following;
I feel the Orbiter panel scale option is acceptable if you scale up (up to a factor of about 1.3 to 1.5, do we agree?), but scaling down turn the labels on the MFD's into hieroglyphics. What I intend to do here is find the range that you all use, identify the popular resolutions, and make a series of panels that are no more than a scale factor of 1.3 to 1.5 apart at most. To avoid you having to fiddle with the scale panel factor, the module will detect the resolution and scale it appropriately, untill it reaches the next panel, then it should use that one. No worry, if there are two very popular resolutions close together, there will be two panels embedded.
But with resolutions like this....
...Depending upon what I'm doing 1920x1200, 3840x1024, 5040x1050 or 7680x1200 is what I use.
...I am beginning to picture a very big module with all those embedded bmps!
Test version soon, standby! Thanks again...