Scientists Identify the Cosmos’ Largest Feature

Soheil_Esy

Fazanavard فضانورد
Joined
Apr 5, 2015
Messages
744
Reaction score
20
Points
18
05.08.2015

Using both ground- and space-based observatories, a team of scientists has discovered the largest feature in the observable universe. It’s a "giant ring-like structure," and our current understanding of physics suggests it shouldn’t exist at all.

The most luminous objects in the universe, gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) occur when massive stars slip into black holes. In a violent display, all of the star’s energy is emitted through incredibly focused beams on either end at close to the speed of light.

In a matter of seconds, a GRB releases as much energy as the Sun does over the course of its entire 10 billion-year existence.

Video
https://youtu.be/7uN1AjMui5k

Only discovered as recently as 1967, the bursts have only been observed in distant galaxies. But if one was to occur in the Milky Way and its beam was pointed toward Earth, the effects could be devastating, dousing the surface of the planet in enough radiation to wipeout even the most resistant organisms.

According to a US-Hungarian team of scientists, not one, not two, but nine of these have been discovered 7 billion light years from Earth. While that’s a perfectly safe distance as far as humanity is concerned, the discovery is raising some eyebrows.

The gamma-ray bursts are arranged in a 36° ring that appears to be over 5 billion light years across. For comparison purposes, the Milky Way galaxy has a diameter of 100,000 light years, and the largest known galaxy has a diameter of only 6 million light years.

1025402645.png

An image of the distribution of GRBs on the sky at a distance of 7 billion light years, centred on the newly discovered ring. The positions of the GRBs are marked by blue dots and the Milky Way is indicated for reference, running from left to right across the image. At center is the ring feature, estimated to be 5 billion light years across.

In fact, everything we know about physics suggests that the largest structure which could possibly exist in the universe is 1.2 billion light years.

"If we are right, this structure contradicts the current models of the universe," Professor Lajos Balazs, of Konkoly Observatory in Budapest, said in the report. "It was a huge surprise to find something this big – and we still don’t quite understand how it came to exist at all."

There’s always the possibility that the GRBs are not bound together by any common gravitational force, but are entirely separate objects which only coincidentally form a ring. But according to Balazs, the chances of such a random occurrence are only 1 in 20,000.

"If the ring represents a real spatial structure, then it has to be seen nearly face-on because of the small variations of GRB distances around the object’s centre," Balazs says.

That refers to the fact that GRBs can only be observed by planets almost directly facing the beam. Any variation makes the gamma-ray burst virtually invisible.

"The ring could though instead be a projection of a sphere, where the GRBs all occurred within a 250 million year period, a short timescale compared with the age of the universe."

Still, even if the structure is a spheroidal ring projection, the void within is at least ten times larger than any known void.

The scientists’ paper has been published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

http://sputniknews.com/science/20150805/1025402391.html

Gamma-Ray Burst Online Index
 
I don't see anything strange about it. Looks more like a bunch than a ring, with no evidence to suggest they are linked.

everything we know about physics suggests that the largest structure which could possibly exist in the universe is 1.2 billion light years
Anyone knows where that line comes from?
What is the limit there?
I thought there were galactic superclusters larger than that?
Even better, how do you define "structure" at this scale?
 
A 1 in 20000 chance isn't exactly, well, astronomical.
 
Probably just slipgates. No biggie
 
It's possible the closeness of the bursts is being exaggerated by the projection used on that map... Not criticising the work, it's just something to consider.
 
It's possible the closeness of the bursts is being exaggerated by the projection used on that map... Not criticising the work, it's just something to consider.

The methology used in the paper also leaves some questions open. Like using a monte-carlo method for estimating the possibility that a number of points on a sphere would appear like a ring. The more coplanar the points on the sphere are, the more it looks like a ring.
 
In before "your mother" joke
 
Back
Top