Humor Random Comments Thread

After indulging in this fantasy for several minutes, Floyd grimly recognizes that airlock decompression would not provide enough delta-v, and the kid would end up orbiting the spacecraft, passing outside Floyd's window every minute.

Well, the sight of the corpsicle's distorted face should be at least a reprieve. Anyway, there should be window shutters available.

If not, time the airlocking with any correction burn. At the very least there will be separation, bonus if the exhaust plume chars the pest's corpsicle for good.
 
Well, the sight of the corpsicle's distorted face should be at least a reprieve. Anyway, there should be window shutters available.

If not, time the airlocking with any correction burn. At the very least there will be separation, bonus if the exhaust plume chars the pest's corpsicle for good.

I'm going to join in this, if no one mines... And within a few orbits (and depending on the inclination), a Bigelow CSS* crew discovers a rather nasty surprise floating out side their airlock... :P

*Not Bigelow; maybe Space Staion V?
 
And within a few orbits (and depending on the inclination), a Bigelow CSS* crew discovers a rather nasty surprise floating out side their airlock... :P

And lawyers on all of Earth are discussing: Who has jurisdiction in space?

And until they find an answer it has become grim reality to invite someone for a trip to a space hotel and suffocate them in their sleep. You only need to buy a one-way ticket, they go down with the other trash.

Too much?
 
And lawyers on all of Earth are discussing: Who has jurisdiction in space?

And until they find an answer it has become grim reality to invite someone for a trip to a space hotel and suffocate them in their sleep. You only need to buy a one-way ticket, they go down with the other trash.

Too much?

1. yes too much.

2. spacecraft have the same legal president as aircraft and ships. The nation where the individual, business or government agency that owns or has primary responsibility for the vessel is registered, has the right to enforce their laws on that vessel. I am paraphrasing a lot but if you want to look up the proper wording read - "United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982", "admiralty law guide" and "International Air Law and ICAO"

You may need to start with this one to get your head around the concept of international laws.

Also I hate lawyers, sucking the will to live out of some jobs, doubling the time and expense of other jobs.
 
Also, the Outer Space Treaty:

Article VIII

A State Party to the Treaty on whose registry an object launched into outer space is carried shall retain jurisdiction and control over such object, and over any personnel thereof, while in outer space or on a celestial body. Ownership of objects launched into outer space, including objects landed or constructed on a celestial body, and of their component parts, is not affected by their presence in outer space or on a celestial body or by their return to the Earth. Such objects or component parts found beyond the limits of the State Party to the Treaty on whose registry they are carried shall be returned to that State Party, which shall, upon request, furnish identifying data prior to their return.
 
A State Party to the Treaty on whose registry an object launched into outer space is carried shall retain jurisdiction and control over such object

So...if I float from Unity to Zarya I've kinda crossed a border? At least on one side the US has jurisdiction and on the other the Russians.
 
This Friday, we will all know the truth. Have I passed the math test?, Or otherwise will receive a demand of the International Mathematical Association?

Do not miss the next chapter of:

Me at math
fp34s7ikop746qs6g.jpg
 
So...if I float from Unity to Zarya I've kinda crossed a border? At least on one side the US has jurisdiction and on the other the Russians.

Zarya is US jurisdiction actually. But, generally speaking, yes. This is also why space tourists on the ISS were being restricted to the Russian part of the station -- US said that they want no tourists in their part.
 
Okay, I've finally figured it out. In case this is interesting and no one knew it beforehand, for any given bipropellant combination, fuel-rich is if the ratio is less than that of stoichiometric, and oxidizer-rich is if that ratio is above.

For RP-1/LOX, fuel-rich is <2.56, while oxygen-rich is >2.56...which corresponds nicely with some existing rocket engines.

Also, there ARE fuel-rich staged combustion engines - specifically any full-flow staged combustion - which needs a fuel-rich preburner. The FFSC also has some pretty nice benefits, so now I'm not surprised SpaceX will be using it for Rapter.

This solves all my problems...

......

RANDOM PHOTODUMP!

5f50f3afgw1ee0d21r6unj20rs0zkjx7.jpg
 
I don't have a Wii U (don't care about the newer consoles), but I think that Mario Kart 8 is pretty cool.

But I saw this:
Rngzic5.png


and needed to make this:
rSEIPLu.png
 
Last edited:

Thats one hell of a font on the chinese rocket... I need to find that...

It always perplexes me that all chinese vehicles that i know of all end with Long/Dragon.
 
It always perplexes me that all chinese vehicles that i know of all end with Long/Dragon.

Probably an interesting cultural difference. European Dragons were beasts slain by saints. Chinese Dragons bring you the much needed rain.
 
Probably an interesting cultural difference. European Dragons were beasts slain by saints. Chinese Dragons bring you the much needed rain.

What i meant is that in a literal context the naming schemes would sound like calling our rockets:

Saturn V-Moon Dragon
Space Shuttle-Gliding Dragon
Atlas-Fire Dragon
 
Back
Top