• ORBITER-FORUM will be temporarily closed at 2026-07-23 18:00 UTC while we complete some OF maintenance tasks. The amount of downtime is expected to take up to one hour, but probably less.

Humor Random Comments Thread

I thought it was a pretty good re-start. Seeing the old characters and their actors was fun and the story moved along pretty quick.

And it doesn't look like the Bills will be winning any Superbowls for a while (old X-Files fans know why!).
 
The first semifinal shown here was pretty good, quite enjoyed it last night. Not the best performance by new England and the final score did not really show how much Denver dominated. But at least the final minutes had been quite exciting.

---------- Post added at 01:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:48 AM ----------

In case somebody missed it, like most of the world...

RIP Jimmy Bain

He was bassist for Rainbow and Dio, and had been involved in some of the best Heavy Metal Albums ever.
 
Wait a damn minute...X-Files is back?!

Dude, what channel, what channel?:cheers:

Fox, of course. IIRC this was the show that put Fox in the big leagues with the Big 3.

---------- Post added at 10:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:14 AM ----------

In case somebody missed it, like most of the world...

RIP Jimmy Bain

He was bassist for Rainbow and Dio, and had been involved in some of the best Heavy Metal Albums ever.

Learned something surprising about Bain: he played bass on the Scorpions' Love At First Sting album and turned down (or was denied by management) a full membership in the band.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Bain

When I was growing up I always assumed I was hearing Francis Buccholz playing bass on that record!
 
My ideas for the new Orbiter:
5oa8jd3zcqmyed46g.jpg

2s1d1suijh8cv7u6g.jpg

https://www.mediafire.com/folder/ta2vg7qqco258/New_graphics
 
85 people died in Taiwan this month because temperatures dropped to -1°C ... mostly in their own houses. :huh:

Hard to imagine here.
 
-1 C is a typical February morning where I live--it wouldn't be any fun, especially in your house, but I don't see how it kills you unless you are over 75.

That may be the demographic that is dying. The elderly often don't have great ability to regulate their temperature, and thermal extremes are extremely stressful. Hours at -1 C when you have no place or means to get warm is a recipe for hypothermia, even for young healthy people. How many in Taiwan have proper winter clothing?
 
That may be the demographic that is dying. The elderly often don't have great ability to regulate their temperature, and thermal extremes are extremely stressful. Hours at -1 C when you have no place or means to get warm is a recipe for hypothermia, even for young healthy people. How many in Taiwan have proper winter clothing?

Those are some good points.

But...damn...people in Southeast Asia make the coats we use in North America:blink:
 
I am officially Interrupting this Conversation very abruptly, rudely, and pointlessly, and am hereby subject to being called a Very Annoying Person(s).
 
After hours and hours of creating fictional address-concepts in school, I got the very definitive impression that a DHCP server can be configured to assign IPs from certain ranges to certain groups of clients (like printers, workstations, etc) without reserving every single one individually.
After a very short practical block that didn't exactly answer many questions, and an hour of googling, I get the distinct impression that this isn't possible in Win 2008. Can somebody confirm or deny that? because if that is true, then I'm somewhat at a loss what the entire address-concept is good for, when the only otions are either statically reserving every single IP or let the DHCP happily give out whatever ip it wants, completely oblivious of the bloody concept.
I'm pished and about ready to set my school on fire by now.
 
After hours and hours of creating fictional address-concepts in school, I got the very definitive impression that a DHCP server can be configured to assign IPs from certain ranges to certain groups of clients (like printers, workstations, etc) without reserving every single one individually.
After a very short practical block that didn't exactly answer many questions, and an hour of googling, I get the distinct impression that this isn't possible in Win 2008. Can somebody confirm or deny that? because if that is true, then I'm somewhat at a loss what the entire address-concept is good for, when the only otions are either statically reserving every single IP or let the DHCP happily give out whatever ip it wants, completely oblivious of the bloody concept.
I'm pished and about ready to set my school on fire by now.


http://linux.die.net/man/5/dhcpd.conf


Client Classing

Clients can be separated into classes, and treated differently depending on what class they are in. This separation can be done either with a conditional statement, or with a match statement within the class declaration. It is possible to specify a limit on the total number of clients within a particular class or subclass that may hold leases at one time, and it is possible to specify automatic subclassing based on the contents of the client packet.

To add clients to classes based on conditional evaluation, you can specify a matching expression in the class statement:

class "ras-clients" {
match if substring (option dhcp-client-identifier, 1, 3) = "RAS";
}
Note that whether you use matching expressions or add statements (or both) to classify clients, you must always write a class declaration for any class that you use. If there will be no match statement and no in-scope statements for a class, the declaration should look like this:
class "ras-clients" {
}

Subclasses

In addition to classes, it is possible to declare subclasses. A subclass is a class with the same name as a regular class, but with a specific submatch expression which is hashed for quick matching. This is essentially a speed hack - the main difference between five classes with match expressions and one class with five subclasses is that it will be quicker to find the subclasses. Subclasses work as follows:

class "allocation-class-1" {
match pick-first-value (option dhcp-client-identifier, hardware);
}

class "allocation-class-2" {
match pick-first-value (option dhcp-client-identifier, hardware);
}

subclass "allocation-class-1" 1:8:0:2b:4c:39:ad;
subclass "allocation-class-2" 1:8:0:2b:a9:cc:e3;
subclass "allocation-class-1" 1:0:0:c4:aa:29:44;

subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
pool {
allow members of "allocation-class-1";
range 10.0.0.11 10.0.0.50;
}
pool {
allow members of "allocation-class-2";
range 10.0.0.51 10.0.0.100;
}
}
The data following the class name in the subclass declaration is a constant value to use in matching the match expression for the class. When class matching is done, the server will evaluate the match expression and then look the result up in the hash table. If it finds a match, the client is considered a member of both the class and the subclass.
Subclasses can be declared with or without scope. In the above example, the sole purpose of the subclass is to allow some clients access to one address pool, while other clients are given access to the other pool, so these subclasses are declared without scopes. If part of the purpose of the subclass were to define different parameter values for some clients, you might want to declare some subclasses with scopes.

In the above example, if you had a single client that needed some configuration parameters, while most didn't, you might write the following subclass declaration for that client:

subclass "allocation-class-2" 1:08:00:2b:a1:11:31 {
option root-path "samsara:/var/diskless/alphapc";
filename "/tftpboot/netbsd.alphapc-diskless";
}
In this example, we've used subclassing as a way to control address allocation on a per-client basis. However, it's also possible to use subclassing in ways that are not specific to clients - for example, to use the value of the vendor-class-identifier option to determine what values to send in the vendor-encapsulated-options option. An example of this is shown under the VENDOR ENCAPSULATED OPTIONS head in the dhcp-options(5) manual page.
 
Thanks for that. Now that I know what term to look for, I can even find it for Windows. And again I'm learning more on this board than in school. I want my money back :facepalm:
 
Back
Top