OrbitHangar has 2 stuck add-ons

[Keatah]

OrbitHangar has 2 stuck add-ons..

15/11/21 [ame="http://orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=6671"]Rosetta - Comet 67/P...[/ame]
14/11/21 [ame="http://orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=6745"]Interstellar System[/ame]

Been at the top of the list for months!

 

[Nicholander]

I know why, some glitch when uploading them caused OrbitHangar to think that they were uploaded on 14th/15th November, 2021.

 

[Ripley]

Mods are aware of this issue
http://www.orbiter-forum.com/project.php?issueid=1183

 

[asbjos]

I know why, some glitch when uploading them caused OrbitHangar to think that they were uploaded on 14th/15th November, 2021.

I would guess it's the other way around: an uploader typing the date in another format than dd/mm/yy (like yy/mm/dd), or simply a typo (or deliberately writing a wrong date), but Orbithangar does not check if the date is set in the future, and accepts any upload date.

In my opinion, the whole option of setting a custom upload date is pointless, and should instead be set to the actual date of the upload to Orbithangar's server.

 

[Lucy]

I would guess it's the other way around: an uploader typing the date in another format than dd/mm/yy (like yy/mm/dd), or simply a typo (or deliberately writing a wrong date), but Orbithangar does not check if the date is set in the future, and accepts any upload date.

In my opinion, the whole option of setting a custom upload date is pointless, and should instead be set to the actual date of the upload to Orbithangar's server.

Yeah, I'm aware of the issue here. There are reasons I haven't patched it yet, but I'm not ready to make a full-scale announcement on what they are. For now, I'll adjust the date on the "stuck" ones so they clear off the top ten lists.

 

[MikeB]

Has any thought been given to adopting the international standard (ISO 8601) for dates in Orbiter, Orbiter Forum, Orbit Hangar, and OrbiterWiki? The date format is
YYYY-MM-DD. It is explained at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601

I've pushed its use at work (in the US) as part of filenames on documents that go through frequent revision. Even though it is "obviously" the most rational choice, there is usually a lot of resistance. But given the international distribution of orbinauts, it might be a useful standard to avoid confusion.

 

[Lucy]

I have amended the dates of the two stuck addons to more sane values.

As far as ISO dates go, I generally use them for anything backend in current projects, while I let user-preference formatting controls re-adjust the format to suit whoever's requesting the date. Internally it should always be ISO.

 

[boogabooga]

Thank you, Xyon. That has been annoying since last November.

 

[Quick_Nick]

Highly relevant xkcd:

 

[Pipcard]

Thank you Xyon, for fixing the issue.

Personally, I do write dates like 2007.08.31
Makes it feel like a stardate without having to look up the MJD (which is more like a stardate)

 

[boogabooga]

Highly relevant xkcd:

Your XKCD reminded me of this XKCD:

Meta, right?

 

[Lucy]

Highly relevant xkcd:

Excellent point. Future revisions of OHM will incorporate the "drawn on the side of an unhappy feline" date rendering method. The format is whatever you can catch before the enraged animal strikes.