Orbiter Screenshot Thread

13.06.01%2021-00-11%20ChapmanInner1.jpg


An interesting picture: I had completed the easiest Chapman Challenge where you are supposed to launch from Baikonur Cosmodrome and travel to the Moon, and I wanted an adventure, so I lowered my orbit and by PeA became 14.7 meters.

The picture features the Sun, the Chapman Inner 1, the Moon, but also the full Earth reflected in the left solar array and the probe's shadow in the right solar array.

Needless to say: I really love the D3D9 client!
 
Having some fun working on a magical "set global velocity" engine. Hate me as much as you like. :P
13_06_02_11-03-35_Enterprise.jpg


---------- Post added at 02:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:19 AM ----------

The Altair under construction at the Shipyards Orbiting Upsilon Andromedae D-I. (really wish there was an actual name for it).
When I flew there a few years ago, I called it Boreas I (the four planets being named after the wind spirits of Greek mythology.)

It would have been a whole lot more interesting back then if IMS had been around. I could have avoided this hideous contraption:

10_08_25_13-57-43_Foundry.jpg
 
The Arrow Freighter on Callisto :

image3zc.png


Add-on here >> [ame="http://www.orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=6075"]Valhalla Landing Site[/ame]
 
Having some fun working on a magical "set global velocity" engine. Hate me as much as you like. :P
13_06_02_11-03-35_Enterprise.jpg

Sweet! Why another one though? There are several working add-ons available for when you need to say "Engage!"


When I flew there a few years ago, I called it Boreas I (the four planets being named after the wind spirits of Greek mythology.)

It would have been a whole lot more interesting back then if IMS had been around. I could have avoided this hideous contraption:

10_08_25_13-57-43_Foundry.jpg

Aughh (eyeballs shatter & fall to the floor)

:jawdrops:

Thats Awful! The control must have been brutal on a stack like that. Why not just a single longshot on its own?

Anyways, the Altair finished her refits, then relaunched just in time to meet the launch window.



A very minimalist ship built for two, with some strange tendencies. More on that later.

accel when fully loaded was only about 0.1-0.2 G
, so I had to double kick my ejection burn. Here was number one:



Coasting away into the sunset:



And back around for the second swing:



After that things went nicely, although the odd quirk I mentioned made for some frustration. Since UPS and D is so far from its star, radiant heating wasnt quite so much of an issue, but whenever it went into planetary shadow, it seemed to experience an MCS overload. My rough guess is that going into shadow puts more of a load on heating (needed to keep the food storage from freezing solid), which in turn cranks up the ASTG generator, which in turn starts producing more heat than the 70 kW MCS can handle...

So things actually get better once you get out into the open.Getting closer to the target:



Approach and orbit insertion burn:





Safely parked in orbit around UPS and d II, but Delta vee will be quite close for the return trip, as the challenges of navigating in a system like this shaved a good 1500 m/s off the budget. Till then

:hailprobe:
 
Syracuse Station 100% complete.
Syracuse_100_percent_complete.jpg


"Mission planning" for this was a bear! I still don't have the scenarios the way that I want them, but the station turned out "more-or-less" the way I'd wanted it. I added an extra solaris module because I figured the power requirements for the "factory" would mandate more power.
 
mock-up rollout:

protox2.jpg
 
What will the livery be ?
 
What will the livery be ?

Shuttle-ish/Buran-ish with bigger TPS panels (I'm considering TKS heatshield or more elastic foam)
 
I meant country of origin.
 
Country of origin is UK/Poland cooperation.

---------- Post added at 06:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:26 PM ----------

Sorry but I've never actualy searched for "livery" translation. I always assumed it is different word for paint scheme.

---------- Post added at 06:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:33 PM ----------

To avoid confusion:

protox4.jpg
 
Last edited:
Shame about that reverse lighting on the Concorde, we never did find a way to get it right.
 
Shame about that reverse lighting on the Concorde, we never did find a way to get it right.

It's a simple normal issue with the mesh yes?

Should be easy enough to fix.
 
Back
Top