Project Nova HLV

K_Jameson

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
1,228
Reaction score
229
Points
78
Hi folks!

Here at Forum Orbiter Italia, a new humble project has begun: the "Nova" Heavy Launch Vehicle, a family of rockets intended to totally replace the old Neptune, Jarvis and Quasar launchers, that some seasoned orbinauts could maybe recall.


Nova will start as a classical expendable rocket, with the expectation of a reusable development if we are lucky.

Currently, I'm busy designing the launchpad for the rocket. I'm looking for some technical drawings of the Long March 5 rocket (that has a similar configuration) and its related launchpad, to help me finish the job. Where can I find it? Thanks!
 
Although not strictly "technical drawings", paper models are usually a quite good reference when it comes to relative dimensions...
Maybe this helps:
 
Thank you!
I'm particularly interested in the positioning of the launch pad umbilicals...
 
I've attempted to model these rockets at the best of my knowledge in the field. I learned a lot - as always, in the midst of such a complicated journey, you discover that your previous knowledge was incomplete at best.

There are five, possibly six versions of the family: Nova I, II, III, IV, V, VI.

All the versions are based on a so-called Modular Common Stage (MCS), metholox, reusable (Falcon 9 style). Unlike Falcon 9, the stage is based on stainless steel, in order to allow a higher reentry speed and avoid the need of a reentry burn. The empty weight is estimated accordingly. The stage has four retractable landing legs between the engines. The mesh also features a header tank, four grid fins for attitude control, repressurization bottles, RCS groups, also for attitude control and ullage. The stage has five engines, common bulkhead and a 5.8 meters diameter. The engine, named Neptune A, is something between the Raptor 2 and the BE-4. From the former it inherites the full-flow staged architecture; from the latter it reprises the larger, cheaper, less compact configuration.

I'm not a programmer and the fellow programmers on Forum Orbiter Italia are long gone, so I must rely on Multistage 2015, thus the recovery is not simulated; instead, i've tried to model, in the spreadsheet I use for the performance calculation, the fuel consumption for RTLS (the only recovery style contemplated here).

All the versions except Nova I also features a cryogenic core stage, aluminium built, expressely designed to be disposable, in two versions, one also of 5.8 meters and the other 8.41 meters. They have the same engine, a slightly scaled down version of the RS-25 named Jupiter A, conceived from the beginning to be expendable, thus arguably cheaper. The small core, named LWCS (LightWeight Core Stage) has one of them, the large XCS (eXploration Core Stage) four. Nova II and III uses the small one; Nova IV, V and VI the large one.

Finally, we have two different upper stages for BLEO operations: HES-2 (5.8 meters) and HES-5 (8.41 meters). They are designed around the same engine (2 of them in the former, 5 in the latter), named Selene C, an expanded bleed hydrolox engine designed to be a good compromise between thrust and ISP.
"C" because it is the third incarnation of such an engine (my ideas varied a lot) and "selene" because the main goal is the Moon. A Selene D version, closed expander with larger expansion ratio, higher ISP and lower thrust, is envisioned for a manned lunar lander.
The acronym "HES" stands for "High Energy Stage" and is inherited from the old HES stages of the Jarvis rocket family on Forum Orbiter Italia.
The goal for the HES stages is to be reusable in the sense that they could remain active in space for extended times, refilled and reused in different missions. To do so, they are both equipped with IVF stations (Integrated Vehichle Fluids) similar to ULA's, in order to assure power, pressurization, ullage, attitude for such extended operations.

While Nova I and II are designed for cheap, routine LEO operations and Nova III for GTO/GEO works and interplanetary robotic exploration, Nova IV and VI are conceived for heavy duties, still in LEO, and Nova V is tailored for manned Moon exploration with a lander of appropriate size. Estimated performances (RTLS configuration for the first stages/boosters) are as follows:

Nova I
LEO 16300 kg
GTO 4400 kg
GEO 900 kg
LTO 3300 kg
LLO 1500 kg

Nova II
LEO 39200 kg

Nova III
GTO 25600 kg
GEO 15000 kg
LTO 22300 kg
LLO 16800 kg

Nova IV
LEO 92500 kg

Nova V
GTO 63100 kg
GEO 38000 kg
LTO 55300 kg
LLO 42200 kg

Nova VI
LEO 127200 kg
 
The complete family. From left to right, Nova I/V
The last one at right, Nova VI, with four boosters instead of two, for superheavy duty in LEO, is only notional, but the core stage and the launchpad will have provisions for its implementation
 
The three engines for the rockets (Jupiter A, Neptune A, Selene C), plus the one envisioned for the lunar lander (Selene D).
Only the two Selene engines are modeled in detail, because will be visible externally on the simulation.
The nozzle expansion ratios are accurate on the meshes.

Thrust (vacuum) is 2025 kN for the Jupiter A, 2670 kN for the Neptune A, 290 kN for the Selene C, 174 kN for the Selene D. Respective vacuum ISPs are: 450, 356, 453, 462 sec.

Sea level thrust and ISP for Jupiter A and Neptune A engines are respectively 1656 kN / 368 sec and 2430 kN / 322 sec

 
Last edited:
The IVF station (Integrated Vehicle Fluids), of ULA's heritage, in four units in the HES-5 stage (two units in the smaller HES-2), is a clever idea to allow extended duration for the upper stage operations. It has a six-cylinder internal combustion engine that runs on the hydrogen and oxygen from the main tanks; the engine provides electrical power for the batteries and the exhaust throwed outboard allows tank ullage. The lubrication fluid heated by the engine goes to an heat exchanger along with the propellants spilled from the tanks, in order to increase their temperature; then, they are recirculated through the pressurization line, back into the tanks, or directed to the RCS engines. Four helium bottles, also connected to the pressurization lines, provides backup.
 
Last edited:
A simulation of the Antares capsule, inside the fairing, atop the Nova V launcher. The rocket is tailored to put the capsule directly in low lunar orbit, or in translunar injection along with some cargo. Frankly I begin to think about a new spacecraft (something more akin to a "small Starship"), but I'm unable to code it, so it would be limited to Spacecraft.

 
Some speculations today. Along with a new lunar lander (not anymore a two-stage vehicle like the old Arcturus and Poderosa landers of FOI's heritage, but now a single-stage vehicle) I'm investigating the option of replacing the Antares crew capsule with something conceptually more modern, also a single-stage, fully reusable vehicle. I also modeled a conceptual sea-level version of the "Selene" engine (Something like the RL-10A-5 for the Delta Clipper), to be used in a propulsive landing in Starship fashion.



In order to estimate the capabilities of this hypotetical vehicle, that would mirror in some ways Starship (in a much smaller scale), I wonder what is the reentry speed of the SpaceX vehicle, returning from an interplanetary journey (Mars for example). Is the reentry direct or is envisioned that the ship slows down in a LEO parking orbit before the final descent? I always assumed it is direct, but sometimes I have a hard time believing that Starship's heat shield can withstand it
 
Last edited:
Back
Top