News NASA's Future: The News and Updates Thread

Back in the day, you had to be an accomplished aviator. Then, you could either be an accomplished aviator or an accomplished scientist. Now, it almost seems that you must be both. :blink::salute:
 
Only five are active military, and Scripps is part of UC San Diego.

They operate the R/V FLIP and do sonar research for the US Navy - I had just seen a documentary about it in TV. :P
 
Well, remember they are not going to fly the Space Shuttle, but Soyuz-TMA-M and maybe participate to manned tests of the ongoing capsule programs. This is more a "test pilots" recruitement class, makes sense. And if they are accomplished scientists, it is even better, of course.
 
Or they are going to an asteroid. :rolleyes:
But alas, no geologists or mineralogists.
 
Or they are going to an asteroid

If this is going to happen, I would rather bet that it will be next recruitement class.
 
Or they are going to an asteroid. :rolleyes:

Not if Congress gets their way. The new NASA Authorization act is in committee right now. They seem to want NASA to forget this Asteroid nonsense and focus instead on landing on the Moon, landing on a Martian moon, and then finally the surface of Mars.
 
8 of 6100 candidates. That's what I call a though selection.
 
A "burst" view of the Orion spacecraft.

1053246_563051473737470_470614164_o.jpg

Source : NASA
 
J-2X Progress: Shaking up the Night

"There are so many extraordinary feats of engineering all around us that we can appreciate and admire, but nothing for me has ever been as visceral as seeing an engine test, especially at night, with the nozzle open to the night air (and not buried in a diffuser). No engine schematic or listing of characteristics or series of still pictures is an adequate substitute for the majesty of that controlled power."

...

First, there is the flash and then, quickly, the wave of noise swallows you where you stand. Unless you are there, you cannot appreciate the volume of the sound. It is not mechanical exactly. It is certainly not musical. It is not a howl or a screech. It is, rather, a rumble through your chest and a shattering roar and rattle through your head. You think instinctively to yourself that something this primal, this terrible must be tearing the night asunder; it surely must be destructive, like a savage crack of thunder that continues on and on without yielding. You are deafened to everything else, deprived of hearing because of all that you hear. Yet before your eyes there is the small yet piercing brightness of the engine nozzle exit that can just be seen on what you know to be deck 5 of the stand and, to the right, there are flashes of orange flame stabbing into the billowing exhaust clouds mounting to ten stories high, tinged rusty in the fluctuating shadows. It is like a bomb exploding continuously for eight minutes and yet the amazing thing, in incongruent fact so difficult to grasp as you are trying to absorb and appreciate the sensation is that the whole event is controlled and contained. You cannot believe that so much raw power can be expressed by what is only a distant dot within your field of vision.

...

wdgreene

 
SLS Monthly Highlights : June 2013

Content :

- SLS Program Kicks Off Preliminary Design Review
- SLS Work Forges Ahead at Key NASA Facilities
- Spaceflight Partners: PaR Systems
- Production of Key Equipment Paves Way for SLS RS-25 Testing
- A Good Fit: Adapter, Delta IV Rocket Test Article Successfully Connected for Exploration Flight Test-1
- SLS Boosters Centered on Qualification Test
- Former SLS Deputy Jody Singer Named Manager of Marshall’s Flight Programs and Partnerships Office


SLS Monthly Highlights : July 2013

Content :

- NASA’s SLS Completes Preliminary Design Review
- First Liquid Hydrogen Tank Barrel Segment for SLS Core Stage Completed at Michoud Assembly Facility
- Spaceflight Partners: Irvine Electronics
- ‘Hammering’ Out the Answer: How Much Impact Can Space Launch System Flight Hardware Handle?
 
NASA Tests Limits of 3-D Printing with Powerful Rocket Engine Check

NASA Tests Limits of 3-D Printing with Powerful Rocket Engine Check

The largest 3-D printed rocket engine component NASA ever has tested blazed to life Thursday, Aug. 22 during an engine firing that generated a record 20,000 pounds of thrust.

This test is a milestone for one of many important advances the agency is making to reduce the cost of space hardware. Innovations like additive manufacturing, or 3-D printing, foster new and more cost-effective capabilities in the U.S. space industry.

The component tested during the engine firing, an injector, delivers propellants to power an engine and provides the thrust necessary to send rockets to space. During the injector test, liquid oxygen and gaseous hydrogen passed through the component into a combustion chamber and produced 10 times more thrust than any injector previously fabricated using 3-D printing.



Image Credit: NASA/MSFC/David Olive


"This successful test of a 3-D printed rocket injector brings NASA significantly closer to proving this innovative technology can be used to reduce the cost of flight hardware," said Chris Singer, the director of the Engineering Directorate at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville Ala.

The component was manufactured using selective laser melting. This method built up layers of nickel-chromium alloy powder to make the complex, subscale injector with its 28 elements for channeling and mixing propellants. The part was similar in size to injectors that power small rocket engines. It was similar in design to injectors for large engines, such as the RS-25 engine that will power NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) rocket for deep space human missions to an asteroid and Mars.

"This entire effort helped us learn what it takes to build larger 3-D parts -- from design, to manufacturing, to testing," said Greg Barnett, the lead engineer for the project. "This technology can be applied to any of SLS's engines, or to rocket components being built by private industry."

One of the keys to reducing the cost of rocket parts is minimizing the number of components. This injector had only two parts, whereas a similar injector tested earlier had 115 parts. Fewer parts require less assembly effort, which means complex parts made with 3-D printing have the potential for significant cost savings.

"We took the design of an existing injector that we already tested and modified the design so the injector could be made with a 3-D printer," explained Brad Bullard, the propulsion engineer responsible for the design of the injector. "We will be able to directly compare test data for both the traditionally assembled injector and the 3-D printed injector to see if there's any difference in performance."

Early data from the test, conducted at pressures up to 1,400 pounds per square inch absolute and at almost 6,000 degrees Fahrenheit, indicate the injector worked flawlessly. In the days to come, engineers will perform computer scans and other inspections to scrutinize the component more closely.

Watch a video of the test below:









The injector was made by Directed Manufacturing Inc., of Austin, Texas, but NASA owns the injector design. NASA will make the test and materials data available to all U.S. companies through the Materials and Processes Information System database managed by Marshall's materials and processes laboratory.

NASA seeks to advance technologies such as 3-D printing to make every aspect of space exploration more cost-effective. This test builds on prior hot-fire tests conducted with smaller injectors at Marshall and at NASA's Glenn Research Center in Cleveland. Marshall engineers recently completed tests with Made in Space, a Moffett Field, Calif., company working with NASA to develop and test a 3-D printer that will soon print tools for the crew of the International Space Station. NASA is even exploring the possibility of printing food for long-duration space missions.

NASA is a leading partner in the National Network for Manufacturing Innovation and the Advanced Manufacturing Initiative, which explores using additive manufacturing and other advanced materials processes to reduce the cost of spaceflight. For more information about the National Network for Manufacturing Innovation, visit: http://manufacturing.gov/nnmi.html

For more information about NASA, visit: http://www.nasa.gov


Media Contacts:

Rachel Kraft
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-1100
[email protected]


Tracy McMahan/Kim Henry
Marshall Space Flight Center
256-544-0034

tracy.mcmahan@nasa, [email protected]
 
NASA Tests Limits of 3-D Printing with Powerful Rocket Engine Check
The largest 3-D printed rocket engine component NASA ever has tested blazed to life Thursday, Aug. 22 during an engine firing that generated a record 20,000 pounds of thrust.
This test is a milestone for one of many important advances the agency is making to reduce the cost of space hardware. Innovations like additive manufacturing, or 3-D printing, foster new and more cost-effective capabilities in the U.S. space industry.
...

Thanks for that. Pretty cool. I'm in favor of getting the propellant for interplanetary flights such as to Mars from the Moon since the lower delta-v to orbit makes it easier to get large amounts of mass like propellant into orbit.
But with 3-D printing maybe we can get all the heavy mission elements from lunar materials including the engines and the propellant tanks. So you would only have to bring up say the complicated electronics from Earth.

Bob Clark
 
In a first time, the main interest is to cut costs and make lie those that say engines like RS-25 are too complex. Simplificating the injector from 117 to 2 parts is quite impressive.

I'm pretty sure that 3D printing is the industrial revolution of the early 21th century, and that once it will get more and more common, it will change quite a lot of things. And yeah, space programs are definitively going to hugely benefit from it. Imagine if you could "print" a whole rocket with a giant printer. A complete engine would already be something. In comparison, doing a car would be easy.

It's definitively the kind of stuff that shows how advanced and costly space R&D is important, and can in the long-term benefit to everyone.
 
That possibility of a "federal shutdown" is crazy. :blink:
 
In a first time, the main interest is to cut costs and make lie those that say engines like RS-25 are too complex. Simplificating the injector from 117 to 2 parts is quite impressive.

"Too complex" is entirely dependant on context, but just as the SSME can benefit from such developments, so can engines that are less technologically demanding.
 
Back
Top