News NASA's Future: The News and Updates Thread

NASA Engineers Resurrect And Test Mighty F-1 Engine Gas Generator

NASA Engineers Resurrect And Test Mighty F-1 Engine Gas Generator : Testing Will Aid NASA's Space Launch System Advanced Development

http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/systems/sls/f1_sls.html


718996main_cam2-004-010_946.jpg

Saturn V F-1 gas generator 20-second hot fire test at Marshall. (NASA/MSFC)
 
Last edited:
Space Politics: As sequestration goes into effect, revisiting its effects on NASA:
[table=head]Account|FY13 CR Budget|Sequester|Post-Sequester Budget|FY13 Request|Difference

Science|
$5,116​
|
$256​
|
$4,860​
|
$4,911.2​
|
-$51.2​

Space Operations|
$4,247​
|
$212​
|
$4,035​
|
$4,013.2​
|
$21.8​

Exploration|
$3,790​
|
$190​
|
$3,600​
|
$3,932.8​
|
-$332.8​

Cross Agency Support|
$3,012​
|
$151​
|
$2,861​
|
$2,847.5​
|
$13.5​

Space Technology|
$579​
|
$29​
|
$550​
|
$699.0​
|
-$149.0​

Aeronautics|
$573​
|
$29​
|
$544​
|
$551.5​
|
-$7.5​

Construction|
$402​
|
$20​
|
$382​
|
$619.2​
|
-$237.2​

Education|
$137​
|
$7​
|
$130​
|
$100.0​
|
$30.0​

Office of Inspector General|
$39​
|
$2​
|
$37​
|
$37.0​
|
$0.0​

TOTAL|
$17,895​
|
$896​
|
$16,999​
|
$17,711.4​
|
-$712.4​
[/table]​


Space Politics: House full-year continuing resolution offers something for SLS and Commercial Crew supporters:
[table=head]Account|FY12|FY13 CR

Science|
$5,090.0​
|
$5,090.0​

Space Operations|
$4,223.6​
|
$4,000.0​

Exploration|
$3,770.8​
|
$4,152.0​

Cross Agency Support|
$2,995.0​
|
$2,847.4​

Space Technology|
$575.0​
|
$575.0​

Aeronautics|
$569.9​
|
$569.9​

Construction|
$390.0​
|
$390.0​

Education|
$138.4​
|
$138.4​

Office of Inspector General|
$37.3​
|
$37.3​

TOTAL|
$17,790.0​
|
$17,800.0​
[/table]

[table=head]Item|FY12|FY13 CR

Orion|
$1,200.0​
|
$1,200.0​

SLS|
$1,860.0​
|
$2,119.0​

Comm’l Crew|
$406.0​
|
$525.0​

Expl. R&D|
$304.8​
|
$308.0​

Expl. Total|
$3,770.8​
|
$4,152.0​
[/table]​


The Planetary Society Blog:
 
NASA : SLS Monthly Highlights (February 2013)

Content :

- SLS Conducts Explosive Tests of New Materials
- Spaceflight Partners: L-3 Cincinnati Electronics
- NASA Awards Final SLS Advanced Booster Contract
- SLS Facility Modifications March Forward
- New Round of J-2X Testing Under Way
- SLS On the Road...
 
Discovery News: Plutonium Production Restarted for NASA:
After a 25-year hiatus, the Unites States has produced its first non-weapons grade plutonium needed to power space probes when solar energy won’t suffice.

{...}

After encapsulating the radioactive starter material neptunium, putting it into a reactor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee and radiating it for a month, the DOE did successfully generate plutonium, said Jim Green, chief of NASA’s planetary science division.

“This is a major step forward,” Green said at recent Mars exploration planning group meeting.

“We’re expecting reports from (the DOE) later this year on a complete schedule that would then put plutonium on track to be generated at about 1.5 kilograms (3.3 pounds) a year, so it’s going quite well,” Green said.

The fresh plutonium has the added benefit of reviving NASA's small and decaying supply of older plutonium still in storage.

{...}


Space Politics:
  • Uncertainty remains the one certainty for NASA’s budgets

  • Senate offers its own take on FY13 NASA budget (updated)

    [table=head]Account|FY12|FY13 full CR|Senate FY13 bill

    Science|
    $5,090.0​
    |
    $5,090.0​
    |
    $5,144.0​

    Space Operations|
    $4,223.6​
    |
    $4,000.0​
    |
    $3,953.0​

    Exploration|
    $3,770.8​
    |
    $4,152.0​
    |
    $3,887.0​

    Cross Agency Support|
    $2,995.0​
    |
    $2,847.4​
    |
    $2,823.0​

    Space Technology|
    $575.0​
    |
    $575.0​
    |
    $642.0​

    Aeronautics|
    $569.9​
    |
    $569.9​
    |
    $570.0​

    Construction|
    $390.0​
    |
    $390.0​
    |
    $680.0​

    Education|
    $138.4​
    |
    $138.4​
    |
    $125.0​

    Office of Inspector General|
    $37.3​
    |
    $37.3​
    |
    $38.0​

    TOTAL|
    $17,790.0​
    |
    $17,800.0​
    |
    $17,862.0​
    [/table]

    [table=head]Item|FY12|FY13 CR|Senate bill

    Orion|
    $1,200.0​
    |
    $1,200.0​
    |
    $1,197.0​

    SLS|
    $1,860.0​
    |
    $2,119.0​
    |
    $1,857.0​

    Comm’l Crew|
    $406.0​
    |
    $525.0​
    |
    $525.0​

    ER&D|
    $304.8​
    |
    $308.0​
    |
    $308.0​

    Expl. Total|
    $3,770.8​
    |
    $4,152.0​
    |
    $3,887.0​
    [/table]

AmericaSpace: NASA 2013 Budget Updates
 
Space Politics: With budget uncertainty resolved, sequestration’s effects kick in:
The good news for NASA and other federal agencies is that they finally have a fiscal year 2013 budget. On Thursday, the House passed the Senate’s version of a 2013 spending bill as expected, a day after the Senate approved it. The passage ends any worries about a potential government shutdown when the current continuing resolution (CR) that was funding the government expired next week. Moreover, the bill is not just a CR, providing specific appropriations (and guidance) for much of the government, including NASA.

The bad news, though, is that the appropriations bill does nothing about budget sequestration that went into effect at the beginning of this month. That 5% cut, along with the 1.877% rescission that was included in the appropriations bill passed this week, means that while NASA on paper gets $17.862 billion for FY13, after those cuts it will only have $16.65 billion to spend, a cut of more than $1.2 billion.

NASA has already been working to factor in the effects of sequestration into its activities. The latest blow came late Friday with a pair of memos from NASA regarding the agency’s education and public outreach activities. “Effective immediately, all education and public outreach activities should be suspended, pending further review,” stated the first memo, first published by SpaceRef. (The second memo, also published by SpaceRef, exempts “mission announcement media events and products” and other news activities from the suspension.) The memos don’t indicate how long the suspensions will last, but NASA mission directorates and other organizations face a deadline of April 15 to submit a list of those activities planned for May 1 and beyond that they deem “mission critical.”

Some people interpreted the memos as NASA canceling its education and public outreach activities, although a spokesman confirmed to NBCNews.com that this is a suspension, not a cancellation. More guidance on activities that will be exempt from the suspension is expected next week.

These memos come after NASA issued a memo last week putting limits on agency travel, including participation in conferences. The memo came just days before a major planetary science conference, the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Houston, causing some last-minute cancellations in participation in the event. The memo also singled out the National Space Symposium in Colorado next month, and the Goddard Memorial Symposium and Dinner earlier this week in the Washington, DC area, as events specifically excluded from travel.

{...}
 
Just a small side note - the sequestration doesn't appear to affect the two "non-NASA" crewed SpaceX missions in 2015. Pending any additional problems, those will stay on course. Just thought that should be clarified some.
 
Last edited:


  • Thanks for that link:

    Back to the Moon? Not any time soon, says Bolden.
    By Jeff Foust on 2013 April 5 at 1:05 pm ET
    A week from Monday marks the third anniversary of President Obama’s speech at the Kennedy Space Center where he formally announced the goal of a human mission to an asteroid by 2025. While that is an official goal of NASA’s human space exploration program, there remains some opposition or, at the very least, lack of acceptance of the goal by many people, including some with NASA, as a report on NASA’s strategic direction concluded last December.
    At a joint meeting of the Space Studies Board and the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board in Washington on Thursday, the head of that study, Al Carnesale of UCLA, reiterated those concerns. “Since it was announced, there was less enthusiasm for it among the community broadly,” he said of the asteroid mission goal. “The more we learn about it, the more we hear about it, people seem less enthusiastic about it.”
    Carnesale suggested that, in his opinion, it might be better to shelve the asteroid mission goal in favor of a human return to the Moon. “There’s a great deal of enthusiasm, almost everywhere, for the Moon,” he said. “I think there might be, if no one has to swallow their pride and swallow their words, and you can change the asteroid mission a little bit… it might be possible to move towards something that might be more of a consensus.”

    The SLS even by its first mission in 2017 can do manned lunar landing missions by incorporating well known and relatively low cost weight saving methods to its core and upper stages.
    This would go a long way towards garnering support both among the public and those in the industry.

    Bob Clark
 
Thanks for that link:

Back to the Moon? Not any time soon, says Bolden.
By Jeff Foust on 2013 April 5 at 1:05 pm ET


The SLS even by its first mission in 2017 can do manned lunar landing missions by incorporating well known and relatively low cost weight saving methods to its core and upper stages.
This would go a long way towards garnering support both among the public and those in the industry.

Bob Clark


A lunar program will not be authorized until the posts of POTUS, NASA Administrator, and majority in Congress are staffed by people born after 1970. The reason is not political, but social.
 
(remember, this is the "News & Updates thread", there is also a NASA future discussion thread)
 
...where's the other thread?

please explain

That's very simple. If you were alive (in US) during Apollo then Moon is not interesting for you, since we have been there. If you were alive during Apollo, then going to the Moon is in your collective psyche. It is not a challenge. It has been done. Hence also the preoccupation with other targets, particularly Mars. Did you notice that only NASA is structuring programs in a way which avoids mentioning Moon as a goal? Even if it is mentioned, it is as a "stepping stone to Mars". All other nations with space ambitions are openly talking about going to the Moon for its own sake. It's right in the linked article:

Carnesale was followed at the meeting by NASA administrator Charles Bolden, who showed no sign of accepting Carnesale’s advice. He noted that a number of nations have expressed interest, to varying degrees, in human lunar exploration. “They all have dreams of putting human on the Moon,”
However, he made it clear NASA has no plans to lead its own human return to the Moon under his watch. “NASA will not take the lead on a human lunar mission,” he said. “NASA is not going to the Moon with a human as a primary project probably in my lifetime. And the reason is, we can only do so many things.” Instead, he said the focus would remain on human missions to asteroids and to Mars. “We intend to do that, and we think it can be done.”
 
Back
Top