Delta Glider design

george7378

DON'T PANIC
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Jun 26, 2009
Messages
1,045
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Hi all,

What prevents the Delta Glider from being constructed in real life? It's not a massive ship, and the shape looks reasonable (unlike the Shuttle-A and PB). I am guessing it is the lack of power from such small engines, and things like materials for parts like the wings.
 
The shape is also not reasonable because the RCS thrusters are firing at the rudders ;)

Also, it has some other problems to deal with...if it would be just 90% effective and all heat energy spread evenly over the whole surface, it would be glowing white as whole while using the main engines.
 
Propulsion is the main problem. I don't think we'll see a DG under chemical propulsion, however, if we manage to make a very powerful electric engine with high specific impulse in a relatively small package, I don't see why not...

Everything else can be sorted out easily. The shape isn't as unreasonable as it might appear.
 
With the exception of a few dangerous qualities (blossoming nosecone) and small things like the RCS thruster placement that Urwumpe mentioned, its not unreasonable.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynx_rocketplane

Its suborbital, but XCOR is aiming for flight in 2010. Likely late 2010 or 2011 as construction of the airframe hasn't started.
 
The 2 major issues would be materials sciences and energy density. Without major advancement in those two disciplines you can kiss a delta-glider bye-bye!
 
Even using NERVA engines and an aerial launch such as a White Knight II type carrier plane, you'd still need a larger fuel fraction than the Deltaglider carries. In other words, you would need an external drop tank and probably some boosters since the fuel tank would reduce the thrust/weight ratio below 1.0--which brings you back to something similar to the Shuttle.

However, if you could have a hypersonic carrier plane, a NERVA-powered Deltaglider could work out as a second stage.
 
if we manage to make a very powerful electric engine with high specific impulse in a relatively small package, I don't see why not...

Well, that would also solve at least two thirds of our problems concerning interplanetary spaceflight... as far as I know, they are not even sure if a high-thrust high-ISP drive is even possible.
 
Nuclear Pulse Propulsion (either fission or fusion) would be high-thrust and high-ISP, but you wouldn't really want to do it in atmosphere. Continuous fusion plasma propulsion, in which you essentially have a fusion reactor and expel the superheated plasma for thrust might work as well. However, high-ISP electric propulsion will probably never reach a high enough thrust-to-mass ratio to lift off from Earth's surface due to the magnetic fields involved.
 
Back
Top