Updates NASA New Horizons Mission Updates

statickid

CatDog from Deimos
Donator
Joined
Nov 23, 2008
Messages
1,683
Reaction score
4
Points
38
I just can't shake the notion while watching that; Pluto looks lumpy, I mean like not even remotely spherical...
 

RisingFury

OBSP developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
6,427
Reaction score
492
Points
173
Location
Among bits and Bytes...
The less dense and smaller something is, the larger the mountains on it can be. Pluto is small and not very dense. Don't be surprised if it's not a nice sphere.
 

Unstung

Active member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
1,712
Reaction score
3
Points
38
Location
Milky Way
I just can't shake the notion while watching that; Pluto looks lumpy, I mean like not even remotely spherical...
Pluto is in hydrostatic equilibrium, it only looks lumpy due to the limitations of New Horizon's camera, or any digital camera for that matter.
A lot of people are commenting that Pluto does not look round in these photos. You're right, it doesn't look round, but that's just an artifact of the way the camera works and the way the images have been enlarged and processed. The processing tends to turn anything that is especially bright into something that looks like a mountain, and anything that is especially dark into something that looks like a hole. In fact, since Pluto is quite large enough for the force of its self-gravity to overcome the strength of its icy material, there is no question that it will be very much round, more round than Ceres. (Pluto has the same density as Ceres, so has similar ice/rock composition, but Pluto has more than 14 times Ceres' mass, so its gravity is significantly stronger.) Roundness is one of the very few things that we can confidently predict about Pluto before New Horizons' flyby, because basic physics does a remarkably good job of predicting bulk physical properties of space objects.

The less dense and smaller something is, the larger the mountains on it can be. Pluto is small and not very dense. Don't be surprised if it's not a nice sphere.
But Pluto is a pretty uniform sphere. The dwarf planet is icy, lacking an active silicate crust so mountains cannot be formed (a result of it being small and not dense). Ices relax and flatten any craters after an impact warms the surface. This can be seen on Ceres and icy moons. The kind of geologic activity that may occur on Pluto would likely be similar to Triton's cryovolcanoes. Speaking of Triton, it's probably the best analogue to Pluto and unmistakably round.

PIA00317_modest.jpg

Solo... It's like Gilly or Minmus? Cool!
The physics in KSP are impossible and I don't know where to start on the appearances of the game's worlds. Pluto won't look like a lumpy ball of cyan salt.
 
Last edited:

Kyle

Armchair Astronaut
Addon Developer
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
3,912
Reaction score
339
Points
123
Website
orbithangar.com
The less dense and smaller something is, the larger the mountains on it can be. Pluto is small and not very dense. Don't be surprised if it's not a nice sphere.

It could be misshapen as the result of a giant impact in the not-too-distant past. That might also explain the many moons of Pluto.
 
Last edited:

Marg

Active member
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
485
Reaction score
68
Points
28
I became addicted to new horizons webpage, looking for increasing size of Pluto every day... but I find Pluto fairly round on non processed images.
 

Ravenous

Donator
Donator
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
sitting at the pointy end
I became addicted to new horizons webpage, looking for increasing size of Pluto every day... but I find Pluto fairly round on non processed images.

Yes, these "lumpy" pictures are very contrast-enhanced and that might be the cause of the apparent lumps.

The unprocessed images show pluto as very, very tiny and with not much detail at all!
 

Cairan

Donator
Donator
Joined
Apr 11, 2008
Messages
601
Reaction score
1
Points
18
Location
Amqui, QC
The physics in KSP are impossible and I don't know where to start on the appearances of the game's worlds. Pluto won't look like a lumpy ball of cyan salt.

I'll start...

Eeloo, Minmus and the Mun have densities 50% greater than the densest of known elements, Osmium, Kerbin is a whooping 3 times Os' density...

The only way to have a solar system looking anything like Kerbol would be to have massive lumps of WIMPs accumulated at the center of the moons and planets. :rolleyes:

Now back to our New Horizon programming :)
 

RisingFury

OBSP developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
6,427
Reaction score
492
Points
173
Location
Among bits and Bytes...
It could be misshapen as the result of a giant impact in the not-to-distant past. That might also explain the many moons of Pluto.

Possible. But I'd put my money down on them being captured.

That said, what Unstung said about Pluto is true, but don't get the impression that it's a smooth sphere. There'll still be mountains, but unlikely to be as high as the mountains on our Moon, for example.


That said, I guess we'll see when we get closer.
 

Unstung

Active member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
1,712
Reaction score
3
Points
38
Location
Milky Way
Yes, these "lumpy" pictures are very contrast-enhanced and that might be the cause of the apparent lumps.
Here are the raw images for reference. Pluto still looks a bit lumpy which I assume is due to the inability of digital cameras to capture high dynamic range scenes. So brighter features on Pluto would be blown out while darker ones turn black.

Processed:
Pluto_viewed_by_New_Horizons_28_May-3_June_2015.gif


There'll still be mountains, but unlikely to be as high as the mountains on our Moon, for example.
Triton doesn't have any (known) prominent raised features and I suspect that will be the same with Pluto. On ice worlds, large impacts can still form significant central peaks, but an active one like Europa or Triton erases nearly all evidence of impacts. Their surfaces end up becoming pretty flat.
 
Last edited:

N_Molson

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
9,295
Reaction score
3,265
Points
203
Location
Toulouse
hehe and I guess that the people behaviour here will be a bit crazy as the probe approaches Pluto...

uhh or behavior... :lol:
 

Marg

Active member
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
485
Reaction score
68
Points
28
Color or colour - anyway spelling in English too often hasn't significant influence to pronounciation. Especially suffer ancient greek and roman names. I was shocked to see IPA for (1) Ceres - looked like it is pronounced the same way as "series". It is strange.
Saturn's satellite Dione must be pronounced like it is spelled - /Dee -Oh - Nay/ , Titan also without "i" alphabetical sound but like in words "it", " is"!
So actually it is pronounciation which should be adjusted, not spelling.
BTW - not related to this, but I wanted to mention that Pluto is spelled Pluton in many languages, it sounds better.
 

N_Molson

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
9,295
Reaction score
3,265
Points
203
Location
Toulouse
If you want to spell all those mythological names "correctly", look at Latin or Ancient Greek. Though there are of course no recording of how people spoke back then, I'd say that the "ancient languages departement" of universities are the most credible...
 

statickid

CatDog from Deimos
Donator
Joined
Nov 23, 2008
Messages
1,683
Reaction score
4
Points
38
Color or colour - anyway spelling in English too often hasn't significant influence to pronounciation. Especially suffer ancient greek and roman names. I was shocked to see IPA for (1) Ceres - looked like it is pronounced the same way as "series". It is strange.
Saturn's satellite Dione must be pronounced like it is spelled - /Dee -Oh - Nay/ , Titan also without "i" alphabetical sound but like in words "it", " is"!
So actually it is pronounciation which should be adjusted, not spelling.
BTW - not related to this, but I wanted to mention that Pluto is spelled Pluton in many languages, it sounds better.

How do you pronounce Ceres?
 
Top