News Add-ons working in Orbiter 2016

[MarkWatney2015]

Soyuz series addon partially working....the Pad Tower (Baikonur LC-1/5) for the rockets does not stand properly on the surface

 

[Fearless]

Quite a few ships require the UCGO and Ummu but not these aren't updated for 2016. any idea how far off this is?

 

[MarkWatney2015]

The whole Halley Armada probes (Giotto, Sakigake, Suisei, Vega 1 and Vega 2) works perfectly in Orbiter 2016!

---------- Post added at 08:46 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:17 AM ----------

...also, the Soviets finally beat the Americans on the Moon on Orbiter 2016

The Sovietic Lunar Program addon works in 2016

 

[Sbb1413]

OrbiterSound 3.5 and its Radio MFD works in Orbiter 2016 without any problems!

 

[boogabooga]

OrbiterSound 3.5 and its Radio MFD works in Orbiter 2016 without any problems!

No, I'm pretty sure that there are problems...

 

[Sbb1413]

I'm not talking about latest OrbiterSound 4.0, even though it has a CTD with Radio MFD. :facepalm:
I'm talking about outdated OrbiterSound 3.5, although I've tested this with D3D7 only. I shall test this in D3D9 soon...

 

[CTarana45]

Location MFD by Chris Knestrick

Location MFD by Chris Knestrick does work in Orbiter 2016! :lol:

Christopher Tarana

 

[MarkWatney2015]

Baikonur LC1/5 addon works now completely! Just replace the Module from the blc1arms.cfg into Module = blc1arms_pylon

Every .SCN file with R-7 (Soyuz) launches should then be:

BEGIN_SHIPS
blc1arms:blc1arms
STATUS Landed Earth
POS 63.3421050 45.9202070
HEADING 90.00
ALT 20.000
AROT 45.123 72.250 86.153
AFCMODE 7
PRPLEVEL 0:1.000000
THLEVEL 0:1.000000 1:1.000000 2:1.000000 3:1.000000 4:1.000000 5:1.000000
NAVFREQ 0 0
ARMS 0 0.0000
ROT 0 0.0000
TWR 0 0.0000
UMB 0 0.0000
END
END_SHIPS

 

[Sbb1413]

DELETED

 

[MarkWatney2015]

The Soyuz-TMA and Progress-M vessels in David413's "ISS Fleet V4.5 for Orbiter 2010" (https://simviation.com/1/browse-Orbiter+Addons-142-1) is working almost flawlessly (the only bug occurs during landing where it only recognizes sea level as the whole surface of Earth)

 

[MarkWatney2015]

The "standard" version of the Cygnus spacecraft from Donamy's [ame="https://www.orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=6660"]Antares/Cygnus update[/ame] works perfectly

---------- Post added 07-16-19 at 02:34 PM ---------- Previous post was 07-15-19 at 03:48 PM ----------

Satellites from thorton's [ame="https://www.orbithangar.com/searchid.php?ID=3209"]Proton Launch Vehicle v2.2[/ame], from AsiaSat-3, Express, and Uragan-M also work without problems

The Proton launcher itself there bugs, however

 

[pappy2]

"AMSO-2016 version 1.23 build 191212"

https://www.orbiter-forum.com/showthread.php?t=41209

http://orbiter.dansteph.com/forum/index.php?topic=14450.msg219282#new

https://www.acsoft.ch/AMSO/2016/2016.html

---------- Post added at 04:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:53 PM ----------

AS WELL AS ALL THE ADDONS AND SCENARIOS CREATED BY THE FRIENDS FOR AMSO ORBITER2010p1 WORK ON AMSO ORBITER2016

 

[STS]

Orb:Connect 3.19 seems to work.


Later in the day I will perform some deeper tests, but for the moment it has a GO with Orbiter 2016.

 

[Ripley]

Soon all Dansteph's add-ons will finally be compatible!

 

[JonnyBGoode]

I've been away a while. I'm glad to see people are still updating this.

 

[N_Molson]

I think such a post is necessary, but ideally it should be curated by 1 active person with admin rights, so that the OP stays up-to-date, because reading 17 pages of posts is too complex. We need a summary.

Edit : and if the active person gets busy by real-life (or hit by a PSB), it should be able to pass the torch to someone else and so on...

 

[Arvil]

Would also be helpful if the download page for each add-on at O-H or wherever they are had a notation for which build they will work and what it needs to work. Many of them you have no idea which build they work in unless you try them out.

 

[N_Molson]

Would also be helpful if the download page for each add-on at O-H or wherever they are had a notation for which build they will work and what it needs to work. Many of them you have no idea which build they work in unless you try them out.

I think that issue has been raised before and of course you are right, it is imperative that add-on devs mention the Orbiter version in the addon title. Else its a mess, entropy is not limited to the physical world, it also works very well on information systems.

Like "Long March 5 LV (2016)" or "HelloMFD (2016 beta)"

 

[4throck]

Version was part of the upload process (a dropdown) until recently, but now it's gone. I wonder if it's temporary.
We used to be able to search by version, type of addon, etc. So that information exists somewhere.
I wonder if help is needed to restore OH to full functionality....

 

[Arvil]

I also notice that if I use the searchbar for something I get a few kabillion returns that are totally disrelated to what I’m looking for.

Edit: But that’s typical search engine. Google and DuckDuckGo tend to do the same thing. I think they teach that in searchEngine101.