- Joined
- Jan 7, 2008
- Messages
- 5,790
- Reaction score
- 780
- Points
- 203
- Location
- Earth
- Website
- orbides.org
- Preferred Pronouns
- she/her
Almost as many engines as on N1, hm?
Almost as many engines as on N1, hm?
Almost as many engines as on N1, hm?
There is always this guy -Somebody should send a priest to the launch site ASAP.
Somebody with lots of extra cash and no sense should build an N1. Kind of like those guys who build bolt-by-bolt replicas of old cars or airplanes. This time, do the engineering right and get the software bugs ironed out and let's see it fly for real.
Just because.
Somebody with lots of extra cash and no sense should build an N1. Kind of like those guys who build bolt-by-bolt replicas of old cars or airplanes. This time, do the engineering right and get the software bugs ironed out and let's see it fly for real.
Just because.
Why?
That's an invalid question.Why? It was a horribly inefficient design.
Why? It was a horribly inefficient design. We can do better than the N1.
Edmund Hillary might say "because it's there", but the N-1 had a bad habit of ceasing to be in any particular "there".
Somebody with lots of extra cash and no sense should build an N1. Kind of like those guys who build bolt-by-bolt replicas of old cars or airplanes. This time, do the engineering right and get the software bugs ironed out and let's see it fly for real.
Just because.
All sorts of low power stuff - lights, monitors, computers, routers, 3D printers, etc, run directly off of a 24 V DC wiring, which is supplied and battery backed by the thing in question.Just curious, what is your "Power supply works better than smells" for?
Edmund Hillary might say "because it's there", but the N-1 had a bad habit of ceasing to be in any particular "there".
Could you imagine somebody sueing the NOAA because they want to make money with the data that the NOAA offers for free?
The new definition of a Pyrrhic victory:
The company WeatherOnline had sued the German weather service for their smartphone app, because it offered information for free, that according to the recent changes of the law (in favor of companies like WeatherOnline, BTW) should only be sold at neutral costs.
Well, now the DWD App costs 2€ once for the professional version (which had 5 million users in Germany) and many people are ranting against Weather Online, not the DWD... paying for an app is suddenly considered some kind of confused civil resistance it seems, Also the poor quality of the WeatherOnline reports is now getting a lot more focus.
Could you imagine somebody sueing the NOAA because they want to make money with the data that the NOAA offers for free?
Does the weather service get to keep the money?