News NASA's Future: The News and Updates Thread

Mars-X is a proposed manned trip to Mars very particular. And it is not designed for any space agency, but by a group of students from the International Space University (ISU). Actually, Mars-X is not a mission to the surface of Mars, but its orbit. Specifically, the largest moon Phobos-red-planet, although it has been conceived as the first link in an exploration program that, over time, would lead us to tread Mars
marsx12.png
Marsx11.png
Captura-de-pantalla-2013-11-19-a-las-20.03.03-580x311.png

http://www.project-marsx.com/MarsxExecutiveSummary.pdf
 
Last edited:
Mars-X is a proposed manned trip to Mars very particular. And it is not designed for any space agency, but by a group of students from the International Space University (ISU).
I saw an article and a video about it some time ago, but I didn't feel obliged to post it in forums, because somehow I don't take seriously presentations using Kerbal Space Program. :lol:

 
SLS Missions projects (Large habitats, lunar station, solar probe, uranian probe...)

New SLS mission options explored via new Large Upper Stage
November 20, 2013 by Chris Gebhardt

As NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket continues toward its initial debut in 2017, a Boeing proposal for a new Large Upper Stage for the rocket would see SLS gain the ability to perform more complex, long-range missions in a more cost-effective manner.

Z215-350x139.jpg


New missions for SLS:

As previously reported by NASASpaceflight.com, Boeing has brought forward a proposal to use the current machining technology at the Michoud Assembly Facility, that will be used to construct the Space Launch System’s (SLS’s) core stage, to construct a new, Large Upper Stage (LUS) for SLS.

Z85.jpg


This proposed LUS would provide SLS with considerable more lifting power for payloads to translunar, solar, Martian, and Uranian targets.

According to the Boeing presentation, available for download on L2, “SLS will play a critical part in enabling the next steps in human space exploration beyond Earth orbit.”

While this has always been a goal of the SLS, as defined by NASA, Boeing’s proposed new LUS would provide greater mission range and support capabilities to already-identified exploration targets and increase SLS’s viability as a competitor in the launch market for translunar, solar, and outer solar system missions.

Z381.jpg


Building an outpost in Translunar Space:

Building off of NASA’s recently announced initiative to use some of the opening missions of SLS to capture an asteroid and bring it Earth-local space, Boeing identifies the construction of a translunar outpost as critical to the success of this endeavor.

As stated by Boeing, “Building a translunar outpost is an important first step in retrieving an asteroid, returning to the moon or venturing to Mars.”

Based on NASA’s intention to use SLS in a “phased development plan” that will increase SLS’s payload lift capability to increasingly larger payloads, Boeing notes that “The SLS will be ideally suited to deliver a variety of payloads to translunar space.

“A SLS/LUS could launch multiple translunar elements simultaneously, reducing the number of overall launches and decreasing the time required to assemble a translunar outpost.”

Reducing the number of launches needed to loft a translunar outpost by the simple addition of the new LUS (machined from already-existing hardware) would add to the promised cost-effectiveness of the SLS rocket – something that has been seen in the initial design cycles of the rocket with the use of numerous Shuttle-Derived Technology components.

Furthermore, a translunar outpost could be used as “An Exploration Platform … [that] would improve the science and technical return of the early missions while also increasing Orion capability through resource provision and providing an abort location and safe haven for vehicle contingencies,” states the Boeing presentation.

This would allow for increased mission duration and safety as well as expanded mission options including sorties to the moon and use of the outpost as an exploration platform from which to commence travel to NEOs (Near Earth Objects) and NEAs (Near Earth Asteroids).

Z104.jpg


While the proposed configuration of this Exploration Platform in translunar space is just that, a proposal, Boeing has identified several preliminary characteristics of the platform.

These include input and construction assistance from the international space community, notably the Russian Federal Space Agency’s prime contract company RSC Energia – with whom Boeing has already performed an initial proposal study.

According to Boeing, “Russian systems are well developed and ideal for these new uses, such as adapting current Russian Science Power Module (SPM) and node designs for translunar use.”

However, RSC Energia, upon studying the initial proposal, identified a hybrid module as the best option for an Exploration Platform in translunar space.

According to the Boeing report, this hybrid module would “shorten the pressurized section of the SPM and add a new node/docking ball section.”

The proposal calls for this new node and docking ball section to be constructed from a Shuttle-salvaged Orbiter Docking System with added “flight-proven Boeing 702 satellite systems.”

Click here for more SLS News Articles: http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/tag/hlv/

Together, this hybrid module and new node/docking ball section would “create an independent, fully functional vehicle with two NASA Docking Standard (NDS) systems for docking operations with visiting vehicles.”

Following the launch and placement of the hybrid module and node/docking ball sections, the SLS with LUS would launch a crewed Orion spacecraft and habitat module (based off the remaining ISS Multi-Purpose Logistics Modules – MPLMs) in a single launch.

Following launch, the LUS would be used to conduct a translunar insertion burn to send Orion and the habitat module on their way to the proper location.

Z223.jpg


After departing Earth orbit, the Orion would detach from the main spacecraft, turn around 180 degrees (like Apollo used to during the moon landing missions), and then dock to the habitat module.

The combined Orion/habitat module vehicle would then separate from the expended LUS and fly to the SPM-derived core component of the Exploration Platform.

Z55.jpg


The modified MPLM habitat module would have its Common Berthing Mechanism (CBM) replaced with an NDS and have its non-CBM end modified to include another NDS.

Its internal space would be modified to maximize habitable volume – something that wasn’t possible with the MPLMs’ use for transfer of removable racks to and from the ISS during Shuttle missions.

Z95.jpg


The new internal volume space would include: “crew living quarters, medical services, exercise equipment, a galley and payload facilities, as well as additional core systems hardware for redundancy.”

According to the Boeing presentation, “these three elements … form a very capable Exploration Platform that would enable and significantly enhance human operation in translunar space.

“Using the SLS/LUS would allow the Exploration Platform to be constructed and crewed in only two launches, as opposed to the four missions required using SLS/ICPS (interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage), thus saving cost and significantly shortening the time required to start accruing the benefits of a crewed Exploration Platform in translunar space.”

SLS Mission: Large Crew Habitat Emplacement

Aside from the translunar outpost and Exploration Platform, Boeing also outlines the SLS/LUS duo’s launch ability for Bigelow’s BA-2100 inflatable habitat module.

“SLS allows delivery of the BA-2100 via direct insertion to a low earth orbit and is the only launch vehicle capable of delivering a payload this large to LEO,” notes the Boeing presentation.

Bigelow’s BA-2100 inflatable module is considered a self-sufficient module for “long duration human habitation” capable of expanding, after launch, to 2100 cubic meters of pressurized volume.

The module itself would carry all the supplies and equipment needed for its mission, which can range from a commercial space hotel to a proving ground for independent scientific research modules.

For SLS/LUS’s part, the BA-2100 could be inserted directly in LEO (Low Earth Orbit).

Boeing further defines SLS as the only vehicle capable of launching BA-2100 into LEO because of the module’s large nature.

According to Boeing, “SLS provides significant mass margin [for BA-2100] that could be used for additional crew consumables or water for radiation protection or additional payloads.”

SLS mission: ATLAST Space Telescope Concept

Moving beyond the immediate Earth area, Boeing also identifies several beyond Earth missions that SLS could accomplish easier and in a more cost-effective manner than already existing launchers can.

Z310.jpg


One of these missions is a proposed ATLAST Space Telescope mission.

Defined as a telescope to “Characterize Exoplanets and search for signs of life,” Boeing states that SLS would be able to loft this 8m monolithic or 16m deployable ATLAST telescope to the Earth-Sun L2 Lagrangian point in a single launch.

Z87.jpg


The current crop of existing EELVs (Enhanced Expendable Launch Vehicles – e.g. Atlas V and Delta IV) would require multiple launches and in-space assembly of the same type of telescope.

As presented in the Boeing presentation, “A monolithic aperture is better than a segmented aperture.”

The currently under development James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is using a segmented, deployed mirror architecture “only because it is the only way to launch a 6.5 meter aperture observatory with a 4.5 meter diameter rocket.”

Since a monolithic mirror can “achieve diffraction-limited performance at a shorter wavelength than a segmented mirror with much difficulty, complexity, cost and risk,” SLS is a more effective launcher for large-scale space telescopes.

Specifically, the Boeing presentation notes that the ATLAST telescope would be capable of observing “~85 stars 3 times each in a 5-year period, probe super massive black holes (SMBHs), conduct direct measurements of the mass of high redshift SMBHs, enable star formation histories to be reconstructed for hundreds of galaxies, track how and when galaxies assemble their present stars, and measure the mean density profile of dwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSph).

This type of telescope would have 10 times the resolution of the coming JWST and 300 times the resolution power of the Hubble Space Telescope.

SLS Mission: Solar Probe 2 Concept

Moving out ever further, Boeing identifies the SLS/LUS capabilities for a proposed Solar Probe 2 mission – the first probe capable of consistent and multiple close encounters with the sun.

For this particular mission, Boeing states that “Solar Probe 2 will provide researchers both in-situ measurements and imagery supporting corona heating and solar wind acceleration investigations.”

Z48.jpg


The probe could also be used as part of a fleet of spacecraft to “develop critical forecasting capability of the space radiation environment in support of human and robotic exploration” of the solar system.

Specifically, the SLS/LUS duo would be capable of placing the Solar Probe 2 into a solar orbit with a low perihelion (minimum of 5 solar radii).

SLS Mission: Uranus Concept

Finally, Boeing outlines the 1.7mt payload delivery possibly of the SLS/LUS to planet Uranus.

According to the presentation, the SLS with the LUS would be able to “Deliver a small payload into orbit around Uranus and a shallow probe into the planet’s atmosphere.”

The Uranian mission would be able to study the ice giant’s atmosphere and magnetic characteristics, identify the dispersal of heat emissions from Uranus’s atmosphere, perform close and detailed fly-bys of the planet’s moons (like Cassini currently does at Saturn), and improve our understanding of the “gravitational harmonics of the planet.”

Z54.jpg


Boeing states that utilization of SLS/LUS for this mission would not only shorten the travel time between Earth and Uranus, but also provide for the incorporation of increased spacecraft mass, thereby allowing for the elimination of the need for a Solar Electric Power stage to the payload.

(Images: Via L2 content from L2′s SLS specific L2 section, which includes, presentations, videos, graphics and internal – interactive with actual SLS engineers – updates on the SLS and HLV, available on no other site. Other images via NASA, Boeing)
 
If congress cuts funding for manned spaceflight im going to riot
 
Looks like they are cutting funding for spaceflight, manned or not :

CBO: Ending U.S. Human Spaceflight Program Would Save Billions

NASA Stops Production of Advanced Plutonium Power Source

Places beyond the asteroid belt are almost impossible to reach using probes if they dont have a RTG as a power source. Except if you send football-fields-sized solar panels with them, and I'm not sure that would be enough beyond Jupiter anyway...

And those CBO bureaucrats know as much about spaceflight as I know about quantum physics... :rolleyes:
 
Fortunately, I'm willing to bet CBO's recommendation won't come to fruition for now. That's an incredibly stupid idea with very little public support. Believe it or not, from what I've seen, very few people think cutting human spaceflight would actually do much to reduce the deficit. It's one of the things out there that has a fairly decent bipartisan support in the public. There's many more things out there to cut that counts as wasteful spending and would reduce federal spending significantly by about $1.8 trillion, you'll note that none of the things mentioned involve HSF.
http://cagw.org/reporting/prime-cuts-1

You'd also see representation in the southern states, Florida, Alabama, Texas, be pretty much against the idea as well.
 
Last edited:
And they are right. It wouldn't and money would be wasted in the Office of the Departement Comittee of Bureaucracy.
 
Space Politics:
SpaceRef: NASA Solicitation: Crew Exploration Vehicle Cockpit Prototyping Phase Four:
{...}

NASA/JSC has a requirement for Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) Cockpit Prototyping Phase 4 research and development (R&D). The objective of the Phase 4 work is to provide human machine interface R&D for defining CEV cockpit layout requirements, displays, and controls rapid prototyping using iterative interaction. The Government intends to award a follow-on contract to the CEV Cockpit Prototyping Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 Contracts. This acquisition will be a Firm Fixed Price, Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract. The period of performance is planned for May 1, 2014, through April 30, 2019.

NASA/JSC intends to purchase the items from Aerospace Applications North America (AANA), Houston, TX. AANA is the CEV Cockpit Prototyping Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 contractor and has contracted with NASA on the three aforementioned R&D projects.

The CEV Cockpit Prototyping Phase 4 R&D tasks are an extension of work completed during Phases 1, 2, and 3. Due to AANA's extensive knowledge of the prototype code, the existing parsing tool, simulator scenario construction, and the current state of the evolving automated display software requirements definition and communication processes, AANA is uniquely positioned to continue to perform these tasks.

{...}
 
SLS Monthly Highlights (September-October 2013)

Content :

- RS-25 : Still the Biggest, Baddest Engine Around.
- Spaceflight Partners: AMRO Fabricating Corp.
- NASA Continues Preparation for SLS Engine Testing at Stennis.
- Adapter Diaphragm Delivered to Marshall Space Flight Center.
- SLS On the Road...


SLS Monthly Highlights (November 2013)

Content :

- NASA Tests Space Launch System Autopilot Technology on F/A-18 Jet.
- Preparing for EFT-1.
- Wind Tunnel Testing Used to Understand the Unsteady Side of Aerodynamics.
- Spaceflight Partners: Honeywell International.
- Members of Alabama Legislature Visit Marshall to See SLS Progress.
- Laying the Groundwork for Best Advanced Boosters for SLS.
- SLS On the Road...
 
President Obama signs $17.6 billion NASA budget

President Obama signs $17.6 billion NASA budget

BY STEPHEN CLARK
SPACEFLIGHT NOW
Posted: January 17, 2014

President Barack Obama signed a budget measure Friday giving NASA more than $17.6 billion for the year, fully funding the space agency's heavy-lift Space Launch System and Orion exploration capsule while falling short of NASA's request to pay for commercial space taxis.

sls_400301.jpg

Artist's concept of the Space Launch System heavy-lift rocket scheduled for an initial test launch in 2017. Photo credit: NASA

The space agency's top line budget is $17.65 billion in the spending bill, which runs until the end of September and was passed by Congress earlier this week. The $1.1 trillion budget covers the entire federal government.

The appropriations bill has its roots in a framework budget compromise reached by House and Senate leaders in December. Lawmakers ironed out the details of the budget over the last month before unveiling the document Monday night.

Congress gave NASA a funding level just shy of the White House's request of $17.72 billion, but the appropriation pads the space agency's deep space exploration programs, setting the Orion multipurpose crew vehicle's budget at $1.2 billion and the Space Launch System's funding line at $1.6 billion, more than $200 million more than NASA said it needed to meet a 2017 launch date for an unmanned test flight.

The Orion spacecraft and Space Launch System are the centerpieces of NASA's plans for human missions to an asteroid and eventually Mars.

In a legislative report accompanying the budget, Congress refused to commit to NASA's proposed asteroid redirect mission to retrieve a 500-ton rock from solar orbit, guide it around the moon with a robotic spacecraft, then send astronauts to visit it aboard Orion crew capsules. Lawmakers wrote that NASA needs to justify the asteroid initiative and provide detailed cost estimates before winning congressional support.

The extra money for SLS will "maintain critical forward momentum" on the program, legislators wrote in the budget report.

A loser in the budget is the commercial crew program, which began funding industrial partners in 2010 and aims to develop a privately-owned rocket and spacecraft to transport astronauts to and from the International Space Station in low Earth orbit by the end of 2017.

After the space shuttle, NASA is turning to the private sector for crew and cargo transportation to the space station, while the government focuses on missions beyond Earth orbit.

NASA asked Congress for $821 million, a figure NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden said last year is required to keep the commercial crew program on track to support an operational transport service in 2017.

The fiscal year 2014 budget calls for $696 million in commercial crew funding, above last year's $525 million budget but short of what NASA requested. The bill directs NASA to hold $171 million of the $696 million in reserve until officials complete an independent cost-benefit analysis of the commercial crew program taking into account the total U.S. government investment in the project and the expected operational life of the space station.

NASA is pursuing the commercial spaceflight program as a public-private partnership in the mold of the agency's development of private cargo vehicles to resupply the space station.

Boeing Co., SpaceX and Sierra Nevada Corp. are currently in funded Space Act Agreements with NASA worth $1.1 billion. Under the cost-sharing arrangement, NASA approves monetary awards to each company upon the completion of preset milestones, such as flight tests, engine firings, or design reviews.

This summer, NASA plans to select one or more companies to complete development of their crew spacecraft and fly demonstration missions to low Earth orbit before the vehicle is certified for NASA astronauts.

Since its inception, the commercial crew program has received less funding each year than requested by NASA.

The rest of NASA's divisions receive funding near requested levels, except for the agency's space technology directorate, which gets $576 million. That is $167 million less than NASA wanted.

Space operations, which includes the International Space Station, receives $3.78 billion in fiscal year 2014 and NASA's science programs get $5.15 billion. Both figures are within a few percent of NASA's request.
 
Here's a more detailed breakdown of what each item in NASA's budget receives:
Account White House House CJS Senate CJS Omnibus SCIENCE $5,017.8 $4,781.0 $5,154.2 $5,151.2
- Earth Science $1,846.0 $1,659.0 $1,846.2 $1,826.0
- Planetary Science $1,218.0 $1,315.0 $1,317.6 $1,345.0
- Astrophysics $642.0 $622.0 $678.4 $668.0
- JWST $658.0 $584.0 $658.2 $658.2
- Heliophysics $654.0 $601.0 $653.8 $654.0
SPACE TECHNOLOGY $742.6 $576.0 $670.1 $576.0
AERONAUTICS $565.7 $566.0 $558.7 $566.0
EXPLORATION SYSTEMS $3,915.5 $3,612.0 $4,209.3 $4,113.2
- SLS/Orion $2,730.0 $2,825.0 $3,118.2 $3,115.2
- Commercial Spaceflight $821.0 $500.0 $775.0 $696.0
- Exploration R&D $364.0 $287.0 $316.1 $302.0
SPACE OPERATIONS $3,882.9 $3,670.0 $3,882.9 $3,778.0
- ISS $3,049.0 $2,860.0 $3,049.1 n/a
- Space and Flight Support $834.0 $810.0 $833.8 n/a
EDUCATION $94.2 $122.0 $116.6 $116.6
CROSS AGENCY SUPPORT $2,850.3 $2,711.0 $2,793.6 $2,793.0
CONSTRUCTION $609.4 $525.0 $586.9 $515.0
INSPECTOR GENERAL $37.0 $35.3 $38.0 $37.5
TOTAL $17,715.4 $16,598.3 $18,010.3 $17,646.5
Each item is in millions USD. Source:
Space Politics: "Omnibus bill gives NASA $17.65 billion (and launch indemnification extension as well)"
The article was written before the bill was signed, but the numbers remain accurate.

Onto my favorite subject, the Europa Clipper:
Budget+changes.jpg

Planetary Science funding went from $1.218 billion White House proposal to $1.345 billion in the Omnibus bill. This will aid the pace of new Discovery and New Frontiers missions and help the Mars 2020 mission get off the ground. The Cassini mission is hopefully safe with the increased funding and temporary termination of the ASRG program, but there are no funds for the Europa Clipper mission. Outer Planets funding still only supports continued formulation activities. Planetary Science requires about $1.5 billion, its historical average, to finally explore Europa in detail.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top