Question General Spaceflight Q&A

tblaxland

O-F Administrator
Administrator
Addon Developer
Webmaster
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Messages
7,320
Reaction score
25
Points
113
Location
Sydney, Australia
1.Before ET SEP, you see some plasma "flames" surrounding the vessel. What causes it?
High energy collisions between the orbiter and particles in the ionosphere. At MECO, the orbiter is only just out of the mesosphere (about 105 km IIRC) and there is still plenty of "air" for it to collide with. The energy transferred to the particles is re-radiated, some of it in the visible spectrum.

3.During entry you see plasma flames. Is it caused by compressed air that heats, friction or any other? How much contribution each factor has in the heating?
Almost all of it is due to adiabatic heating from compression at the shock front.
 

Dambuster

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2008
Messages
790
Reaction score
1
Points
18
Location
UK
High energy collisions between the orbiter and particles in the ionosphere. At MECO, the orbiter is only just out of the mesosphere (about 105 km IIRC) and there is still plenty of "air" for it to collide with. The energy transferred to the particles is re-radiated, some of it in the visible spectrum.

Do you know of any websites with information about this? It sounds quite interesting :)
 

rucinter

New member
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Does the shuttle crew carry with them all the checklists, in printed form? For STS-131 I've counted over 1500 pages of checklists.
 

garyw

O-F Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Addon Developer
Tutorial Publisher
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
10,485
Reaction score
209
Points
138
Location
Kent
Website
blog.gdwnet.com
Yes. You can see a photo here of the flight plan (which is a collection of the checklists) here:

Space-Shuttle-Discovery-STS-116-061.preview.jpg
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,604
Reaction score
2,324
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
Does the shuttle crew carry with them all the checklists, in printed form? For STS-131 I've counted over 1500 pages of checklists.

Only the flight data files. Yes, that means all ~1000 pages of it, often in multiple copies of the same checklist (For example, CDR, PLT and MS1 have all a copy of the ascent checklist during launch). Remember that the flight supplements replace pages of the base checklists, they don't add new pages.

And then add also execute packages, that are send to the crew from the ground to include last minute changes and printed over the on-board color printer.
 

DaveS

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Beta Tester
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
9,434
Reaction score
688
Points
203
And then add also execute packages, that are send to the crew from the ground to include last minute changes and printed over the on-board color printer.
If the printer and Ku EA-1 works!
 

rucinter

New member
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Why is the Leonardo MPLM (and I'm guessing the others too) only half of the payload bay length? Does the extra space in the bay used for something else during a mission or the limitation was done due to weight concerns?
 

garyw

O-F Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Addon Developer
Tutorial Publisher
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
10,485
Reaction score
209
Points
138
Location
Kent
Website
blog.gdwnet.com
The MPLM carries quite a bit of weight so it's purposely put at the back of the orbiter for CoG reasons. All MPLM's are the same size.
Often there is a rack behind the MPLM which is used to hold ISS spare parts or other items.
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,604
Reaction score
2,324
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
Why is the Leonardo MPLM (and I'm guessing the others too) only half of the payload bay length? Does the extra space in the bay used for something else during a mission or the limitation was done due to weight concerns?

Mostly commonality to other station modules, the MPLM is similar to the Columbus module in its primary structure, and the size of the Columbus module was reduced for saving costs for the Europeans, the original European module for Freedom was full-length.
 

Orbinaut Pete

ISSU Project Manager
News Reporter
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
4,264
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Why is the Leonardo MPLM (and I'm guessing the others too) only half of the payload bay length? Does the extra space in the bay used for something else during a mission or the limitation was done due to weight concerns?

MPLMs are launched full of racks, which is why they have to be small. If they were any larger, the Shuttle would never get off the ground.
Modules that are larger than the MPLM (like the JPM for example) have to be launched with no racks inside them due to weight limitations.
 

garyw

O-F Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Addon Developer
Tutorial Publisher
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
10,485
Reaction score
209
Points
138
Location
Kent
Website
blog.gdwnet.com
Wasn't JPM outfitted over 2 or three launches? if I recall right it only launched with a third of the racks that it's now got.
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,604
Reaction score
2,324
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
The MPLM carries quite a bit of weight so it's purposely put at the back of the orbiter for CoG reasons.

Is only a part of the reason, the IUS missions had the CoG of the heavy payload far further forward, while occupying the whole payload bay.
 

Orbinaut Pete

ISSU Project Manager
News Reporter
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
4,264
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Wasn't JPM outfitted over 2 or three launches? if I recall right it only launched with a third of the racks that it's now got.

Correct.

The JPM was launched with a few system racks aboard it, and nothing else. Most of the racks for the JPM were launched in the smaller JLP on STS-123.
This is what the JPM looked like at launch - as you can see, it's pretty much empty.
225065main_02_124_yamamoto.jpg


kiboingress.jpg
 

TSPenguin

The Seeker
Joined
Jan 27, 2008
Messages
4,075
Reaction score
4
Points
63
Or you have the ISS nearby, who also have a printer in their home-office.

What kind of printers are being used on STS and ISS?
Have they ever been upgraded and what renditions were there?
How many pages/meters of papers do they usually have?
Do they use regular paper or a special one?
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,604
Reaction score
2,324
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
What kind of printers are being used on STS and ISS?

Not sure on the ISS, but the Shuttle uses ink printer that looks a lot like a Epson in the past missions, according to the Orbit Operations Checklist.

Have they ever been upgraded and what renditions were there?

often... the initial one was a thermo-printer, there had been some upgrades in the last years. The first test of a ink jet of the current type was STS-95.

http://www.shuttlepresskit.com/STS-95/dto14.htm

http://global.epson.com/newsroom/fast_facts.htm

How many pages/meters of papers do they usually have?

About 200 sheets was the last number I remember.

Do they use regular paper or a special one?

Special fire-safe paper, that follows NASA flight safety standards.
 

rucinter

New member
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Do they still use the famous Fischer AG-7 space pen?
 

TSPenguin

The Seeker
Joined
Jan 27, 2008
Messages
4,075
Reaction score
4
Points
63
Thank you Urwumpe. Up until now, I was completely unaware that they had a printer on board. Thinking about it now, it makes very much sense.
I shall inquire further on my own.
 

IronRain

The One and Only (AFAIK)
Administrator
Moderator
News Reporter
Donator
Joined
Oct 11, 2009
Messages
3,484
Reaction score
403
Points
123
Location
Utrecht
Website
www.spaceflightnewsapi.net
How do the astronauts talk to houston during launch and re-entry actually? because I never see any wires or something..
 
Top