Well Cosmos 2251 was at 74.0° and the Iridiums fly at 86.4°, so the minimum RInc is 12.4°. At an orbital velocity of 7460m/s (790km circular), that makes an impact velocity of sin(12.4)*7460 = 1602m/s! Pretty substantial, as a minimum.More detail about the orbits would be interesting, especialy the Rinc.
Well Cosmos 2251 was at 74.0° and the Iridiums fly at 86.4°, so the minimum RInc is 12.4°. At an orbital velocity of 7460m/s (790km circular), that makes an impact velocity of sin(12.4)*7460 = 1602m/s! Pretty substantial, as a minimum.
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:13:57 -0800 (PST)
From: T V I <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Iridium, Cosmos collide
To: [email protected]
.....And short animation
[URL]http://i39.tinypic.com/2vbk75z.gif[/URL]
From the SeeSat-L email list:
At a glance, RInc was close to 90 degrees!Code:Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:13:57 -0800 (PST) From: T V I <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Iridium, Cosmos collide To: [email protected] .....And short animation [URL]http://i39.tinypic.com/2vbk75z.gif[/URL]
Well Cosmos 2251 was at 74.0° and the Iridiums fly at 86.4°, so the minimum RInc is 12.4°. At an orbital velocity of 7460m/s (790km circular), that makes an impact velocity of sin(12.4)*7460 = 1602m/s! Pretty substantial, as a minimum.
I am well aware of that - notice the use of the word minimumDon't forget LAN.![]()
You could also have a head-on collision, even at the same inc.
The obvious question is: Is anyone making a Scenario?
If the important people had been paying attention and tracking the satellites, the chance would have been zero.
Not true. It's hard to track a satellite that's dead as it requires several radar fixes to work out it's height, position, speed, direction and so on.
The obvious question is: Is anyone making a Scenario?