Rant Transformers III. WARNING: Contains spoilers!

Scav

Mostly Harmless
Joined
May 8, 2010
Messages
1,002
Reaction score
38
Points
48
Alright. I saw this movie tonight with the expectation of having a good time. That ship sailed right at the point the technical goofs started popping up left and right. So, without further ado:

First act: Totally LOVED the Apollo 11 sequence. I felt they got pretty well spot on with the historical events, up until . . .

. . . the Ark crashing onto the moon.

C'mon, guys. The possibility of large-scale fireball-spewing explosions in space is unlikely. There is gaseous combustion a la an explosion, but no fire. And besides -- I can see ordinance lighting off given a hard enough impact (as was depicted here) with a (semi)solid object. What I'm kinda 'huh?!'-ing at is the big gasoline explosions we've seen since Bay released Pearl Harbor pouring out of the Ark as it smacks lunar soil.

Second act:

Yay. We start right away with a little something for the teenaged guys out there. Hey. It's a modern Hollywood production; gotta have something for everybody, y'know? :rolleyes:

The NASA moon landing conspiracy aside, it was at least interesting to see them put together a parallel with the US/Soviet space race having far more ulterior motives (a la the Russians actually getting away with scoring evidence of extraterrestrial life on the Moon earlier than when we actually set foot on the same). Having Buzz Aldrin himself actually deliver a 35-second-long cameo was sheer ham, and probably worth the $9 admission.

Third act:

Full. I mean seam-busting full of action sequence after action sequence. [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deus_ex_machina"]Deus ex machina[/ame] are plentiful here. It was almost painful to watch, though I think it was the borderline ridiculous fighting sequences I was seeing whilst repeating to myself over and over, "Are you :censored: kidding me?"

Also along the lines of "(sarcasm)I totally didn't see that coming!(/sarcasm)" was the sudden face/heel turn of this Prime that they introduced half-way through the film. I felt they gave about enough character development for a kid to really become emotionally attached to this autobot. Then they abruptly yanked him over to the Decepticon side.

Then!

This is the BEST PART!

They blow up Space Shuttle Discovery (without really blowing her up -- you can actually SEE the fully intact vehicle drop away from the explosion plume!), and THEN! They actually teleport half of a jupiter-sized planet within a thousand kilometers of Earth's surface -- and nothing happens!

One would THINK the gravitational perturbations of a rock the size of friggin' Cybertron suddenly appearing within close proximity of Earth would at LEAST cause a 2012-esque global disaster of epic proportions.

Oh well. It's just a movie, right? And as abrupt as this movie has been, I'm finding myself quite abruptly all out of rant. :tiphat:
 
I saw the film this week too - I also loved the space based plot, and I agree - Buzz Aldrin's appearance was a treat. I picked up on a few (relatively small) goofs too:

- Why was it Collins in the CSM who said 'the Eagle has landed' when Buzz said it in real life?

- Why did the loss of signal with the Command Module have anything to do with the LM's communications?

Definitely a great movie though.

- Oh yes, and how could all the autobots hide in one (burning) SRB when you'd struggle to get them all in the cargo bay?
 
Last edited:
Hahaha, I enjoyed the movie despite "goofs". It wasn't intended to be realistic. The only thing that I found to be particularly weird is that the CSM flies to the moon without the LM! The LM just shows up in the next scene.
The landing and audio was out of sequence. I believe there were issues of sound in space. And something impacting the moon from god knows where (interesting trajectory) should make more of a show. (so much friction, much of the craft should vaporize) But it's a movie. Let Hollywood be Hollywood, and seperate from scifi or documenteries.
 
My review can be summed up in a few words - Don't watch it.

I really didn't like it. Over hyped with too many battle scenes that lacked actual content, not enough story, Leonard Nimoy (yet again) and Buzz Aldrin who must be so desperate for cash that he cashed in on the moon landing like this. 1/10. I now plan to avoid Micheal Bay like the plague.
 
AAARRRGGGHHHH!!!!!! I'v just discovered that the only reason to see ANY of (crap) Transformers movie is missing in this last episode, to me there is no reason left:

Megan_Fox_LF.jpg
 
I saw it, and liked it. Yes there were plenty of goofs. But you can't expect a perfect movie with perfect realism when it's about giant sentient robots from Cybertron.

I loved the SFX. The collapsing buildings were great to see on the big screen. That's Michael Bay for ya :P

Overall, it was good. And I'm happy Nolan didn't drag us to Harry Potter :P
 
AAARRRGGGHHHH!!!!!! I'v just discovered that the only reason to see ANY of (crap) Transformers movie is missing in this last episode, to me there is no reason left:

Megan_Fox_LF.jpg

Really? I personalty find her quite unattractive. Lacking any attractive features or distinctions. A prime example of an average nobody dolled up by Hollywood.
 
Really? I personalty find her quite unattractive. Lacking any attractive features or distinctions. A prime example of an average nobody dolled up by Hollywood.

Attractiveness is scientifically linked to 'averageness' of a face; it is an indicator of a lack of disease or problematic genetics.

I'll acknowledge that Megan Fox can be considered attractive to many, but I'm not going to fork over money for a movie ticket just to gawk over her.
 
Attractiveness is scientifically linked to 'averageness' of a face; it is an indicator of a lack of disease or problematic genetics.

So . . . you are inferring that Lady Gaga isn't attractive?
 
So . . . you are inferring that Lady Gaga isn't attractive?

I haven't been able to see past all the makeup and absurd clothing enough to get a sound personal judgement on the matter. :P
 
Really? I personalty find her quite unattractive. Lacking any attractive features or distinctions. A prime example of an average nobody dolled up by Hollywood.

-1!!!
+1 hope to get her!!! :lol:

Attractiveness is scientifically linked to 'averageness' of a face; it is an indicator of a lack of disease or problematic genetics.

I'll acknowledge that Megan Fox can be considered attractive to many, but I'm not going to fork over money for a movie ticket just to gawk over her.

Just to be clearer on my joke: I really HATE (ooops, sorry), DISLIKE transformers, never liked, and never I will. I never paid 1 penny to see those ugly, stupid movies that I couldn't believe produced by Spielberg, who admire as director. And for Megan Fox, I would prefer to see her in other kind of films... :tiphat:
 
Besides Buzz appearance, I enjoyed hearing Leonard Nimoy saying "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few". Also, I really liked seeing Discovery on the pad, to bad they had to modify her into some weird hollywood-style spacecraft. There aren't to many movies in which you can see Discovery, Buzz Aldrin and/or hear Nimoy.
 
Today I did an unspeakable thing.

Today I... I saw... the Transformers movie.

Please don't waste your money on this one. It's a window into the mind of Micheal Bay. Which is, incidentally, a very, very scary place. And not in a horror movie sense. In a Transformers movie or Armageddon movie sense. Very scary indeed. :uhh:
 
Last edited:
Best scene from the movie:
"Let me do the word..."
*knock knock, window slides open*
"до свидания"
"Zhat means goodbye..."

Oh, did any Firefly fan noticed that Wash played that freaky butler? His accent was creepy.
 
Back
Top