"Strange" lights on Ceres

statickid

CatDog from Deimos
Donator
Joined
Nov 23, 2008
Messages
1,683
Reaction score
4
Points
38
sure, but exposure time doesn't really matter without knowing the sensitivity of the ccd, f-ratio, aperture...ect/probe instrument equivalents.

in general, probes tend to use fairly long exposure times compared to hand-held photography.

I think we can all rest assured that when they want a clear picture of the bright spots, they will adjust the equipment accordingly
 

dman

Active member
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
179
Reaction score
8
Points
33
Ice volcano would require some heat source to create the liquid water to be forced upward toward the surface where it flash freeze into ice.

Question is what is heat source....??

Sulfur volcano on IO and the ice volcano on Saturn moons are powered by the tidal
forces from Jupiter/Saturn.

Ceres is too far from Jupiter for the tidal forces

Radioactive minerals (Uranium/Thorium/Potassium) perhaps........
 

fsci123

Future Dubstar and Rocketkid
Addon Developer
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Messages
1,536
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
?
index.php


This image gives a little more perspective on the great white dots of Ceres.
 

Unstung

Active member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
1,712
Reaction score
3
Points
38
Location
Milky Way
What is the exposure time in the photographs that sends Dawn? With long exposure time with higher albedo are very bright, even brilliant.
At Vesta, the camera typically had exposure times of 1/100 second through the clear filter. Fun fact, Dawn's Framing Camera can achieve exposure times of 1/1000 second to 3.5 hours and the lens is a 150mm telephoto with an aperture of f/7.9. The albedo of the white spots is at least 40% compared to about 10% for Ceres.

Vesta has an albedo of 42%, it's brighter than Ceres. Vesta is also closer to the sun with a semimajor axis of 2.4 AU compared to 2.8 AU for Ceres. With this information, it should be possible to calculate Dawn's exposure time at Ceres.

The solar intensity is about 75% at Ceres compared to Vesta. Vesta is also 4x more reflective. So exposure times should be about 5.5x longer at Ceres. If my logic is correct, 1/100 * 5.5 means that Dawn would need an exposure time of 1/20 to 1/10 second at Ceres through the clear filter.

If Dawn was shooting through the color filters, the exposures would need to be about 10 to 100x longer. So around 1 to 10 seconds.
 
Last edited:

Andy44

owner: Oil Creek Astronautix
Addon Developer
Joined
Nov 22, 2007
Messages
7,620
Reaction score
7
Points
113
Location
In the Mid-Atlantic states
If Dawn was shooting through the color filters, the exposures would need to be about 10 to 100x longer. So around 1 to 10 seconds.

With exposure times that long, I wonder what kind of motion blur you're going to get, depending on the distance and relative motion between the vehicle and Ceres.
 

steph

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
1,394
Reaction score
716
Points
113
Location
Vendee, France
Thinking maybe some sort of momentum wheels and a good image stabilizer on the cam?
Even by how a normal camera reacts to the slightest movement in long exposure photos, I guess it's a big problem, especially if using very long exposures. But maybe as it closes in on the planet, exposure times drop a bit.
 
Top