Humor Random Comments Thread

One ringy-tingy. Two ringy-tingy...

Three ringy tingy. Seven ringy-tingy. Nine ringy tingy. One ringy-tingy.

One ringy-tingy to rule them all, one ringy-tingy to find them,
One ringy-tingy to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them.
In the land of Sesame where the muppets lie.
 
Speaking of Middle Earth, I feel like I once heard about a Middle Earth planet for Orbiter. Is that still available somewhere?
 
Of course, if it hadn't worked..... what a bad way to doom the free peoples to darkness.

If it wouldn't have worked the world would soon be swarmed by evil creatures from the gates of Mordor to the Shire, everywhere.
Such a world would not be worth living in, so either you defeat the evil and live happily afterwards or you die heroicly in a battle before ending up in a world being controlled by evil forces.
 
It's clear to me what series of books I need to read (again) soon... :thumbup:

Has anyone gotten the "War of the Ring" books (edited) by Christopher Tolkien? I saw the set for $50 at Books-a-million.
 
Last edited:
Yep, and whoever gets the 1,000,000th post gets a free IPhone!!!

CLICK TO GET YOURS NOW!!!

Certainly a contest with potential delivery problems. I was wondering if the site admins could create a running counter on Orbithangar Mods so we can see the total number of downloads from the site.
 
Has anyone else noticed the 40000th post has mysteriously vanished?
 
Has anyone else noticed the 40000th post has mysteriously vanished?

Mysteriously? *looks over to orb* Yeah, I guess it was mysteriously, we never had a discussion about that here. You could even say it...*searches for glasses-smiley dammit*...got :ninja:'d...
 
Either everyone has to read more Tolkien or I get my post counter real high through this:

Wikipedia said:
The idea of the Eagles transporting the Ring to Mount Doom, or at least part of the way, is not discussed in The Lord of the Rings and Tolkien himself apparently never specifically addressed it, except in an oblique manner. In The Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien, he stated: "The Eagles are a dangerous 'machine'. I have used them sparingly, and that is the absolute limit of their credibility or usefulness. The alighting of a Great Eagle of the Misty Mountains in the Shire is absurd; it also makes the later capture of G. [Gandalf] by Saruman incredible, and spoils the account of his escape." (Letter 210) In the DVD commentary for Peter Jackson's film adaptation of The Return of the King, Jackson and Fran Walsh joke that not using the Eagles to travel directly to Mount Doom was a plot hole, at which point Philippa Boyens angrily points out to them that the Flying Nazgûl would have intercepted them had they attempted this, and it simply became a common joke that it was a plot hole because the Flying Nazgûl were not introduced in the first film, a point to which Jackson and Walsh humbly conceded.

And again, I doubt Frodo could have resisted the power of the ring and simply throw it down.

Just to show that there are plotholes elsewhere: Why does Obi-Wan call Vader "Darth" in Episode IV, although he knows him better than maybe everyone else alive. Why would he call his old friend, who betrayed him, "Dark Lord of the Sith", instead of Anakin or Vader? And why do the imperial generals call him "Lord Vader", when Vader already has a title, "Darth"?
Or is it like in the old days, when everyone was called John, James etc and now everyone becoming a Sith calls himself after Vader, while a time-traveling Doctor Who revealed to the early Siths how they have to call themself?
 
Well sure, if you want to bring up Star Wars, we have plenty of material there to demonstrate on how not to do a plethora of things.


Star Wars. Rubbish.




But back to the better work, as much as Lord of the Rings reads as a history, and in fact meant to be seen as that, it is only so on the surface. There is a lot going on underneath. And several messages weaved into the themes of the story.
 
Didn't Narsil break in the book when Sauron stepped on it? A tiny difference, but yes... well, a sword that breaks when you step on it, instead of just bending, is also no sign of craftmanship, but maybe it was Morgoths corrupting aura that made the sword weak and brittle. But it never broke into 6 parts in the book.

I don't think anything is really said in the book about how Narsil broke, just that it did.
 
I don't think anything is really said in the book about how Narsil broke, just that it did.

If I recall correctly, Anduril is still referred to as being remade from the 'shards of Narsil,' implying it was shattered, not only snapped, but that could simply be the romantic imagery he is known for.
 
Either everyone has to read more Tolkien or I get my post counter real high through this:



And again, I doubt Frodo could have resisted the power of the ring and simply throw it down.

Just to show that there are plotholes elsewhere: Why does Obi-Wan call Vader "Darth" in Episode IV, although he knows him better than maybe everyone else alive. Why would he call his old friend, who betrayed him, "Dark Lord of the Sith", instead of Anakin or Vader? And why do the imperial generals call him "Lord Vader", when Vader already has a title, "Darth"?
Or is it like in the old days, when everyone was called John, James etc and now everyone becoming a Sith calls himself after Vader, while a time-traveling Doctor Who revealed to the early Siths how they have to call themself?

Let's say that Middle Earth has yet to invent airborne dog-fighting, or the microwave eye (a.k.a. radar)..... :lol:
 
It was shattered by something built for shattering things that need shattering. Duh.
 
Back
Top