Why do you say that? I mean can all those scientists and physicists they are interviewing on the particular program I watched be wrong? I mean I am sure they can but these are creditable people that work in the field. I would like to know what leads you to that conculsion.
Granted it's not as bad as the History Channel, but yes, one problem is TV-scientists who either demonstrate bad science or severly dumb down science for the audience. Narration and editting make it a big step worse by taking things out of context. Check History Channel for the possible future of Science Channel: ancient aliens, zombies, nibiru, mayan apocalypse, etc. It is not hard to find someone who is willing to be called an "expert" in psuedoscience.
This should probably be made into another thread though, if anyone wants in on the discussion.
Edit/add: Even brilliant scientists such as Hawking have their work butchered into sci-fi. Or at least, the Science Channel doesn't adaquately distinguish between science and sci-fi and misleads many viewers.
Last edited: