- Mar 18, 2008
- Reaction score
Let me know if this looks correct. The three robotic animations work fine but there are no parent attachments. I may have the syntax wrong.
Thanks for the example.
I guess the quickly patched-up PDF documentation is a bit misleading, because the parenthesis there are just for clarifying the optional nature of the underscore parts. So it should be TIP_1_1 instead of TIP(_1)_1 (and the like). Technically, it could also be ROBOTIC_ARM1 instead of ROBOTIC_ARM(1), but this really doesn't matter with the current parser, because it is the order of definition (and not the extension number) that determines the arm number. The first one is 0, counting up.
---------- Post added at 09:09 ---------- Previous post was at 06:59 ----------
While commuting today, I've compared the SC3 arm mode with genericvessel, and I think I've nailed the "let go of shift" thing you are seeing.