Search results

Anything in the log ?

A classic !

So the problem is the GEM-63XL ?

Yes, it is a matter of risk management at this point. But I think they are reasonably cautious people. The big first is done since 1969, obviously. Landing a woman on the surface is a nice achievement, but it won't be the first homo sapiens on the Moon.

It does, NASA mentions the two bright spots (galaxies) as 'the eyes' 😅

One of the favored theories about wormholes is that one 'end' would be a black hole, the other a white hole. Both objects are possible in theory. Black holes are a proven thing (thanks to Hubble). White holes are not, they would be like 'matter fountains'. It would also make the wormhole kind...

Maybe he uses too much Ketamine...

So there's the singularity itself - we don't really know how it looks, except that no light can escape its gravity. Note that it bends the light that comes from behind, causing what is called 'gravitational lenses'. So the background stars around the singularity should look badly distorted (the...

Oh, another lunar spacecraft.

No.

Maybe sci-fi spacecraft like the DG could benefit from a 'look-forward' radar altimeter, and also powerful landing lights.

Sure, but one thing to consider is that Orbiter is a simulator.

What you see is realistic. Apollo missions had to target launch windows during which the Moon was in the right phase (enough light).

Yes, the lie is to suggest people that a crewed Moon mission can be remotely affordable (with current existing, non-PowerPoint technology).

Depends, its a matter of budget. 'Affordable' sounds a bit subjective.

Complex machine. I was expecting some issue like that.