Search results

  1. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    Day 5 7) At 96:25 in the LM (photo 6), after the “RATE GYRO check” there is the “Docked IMU Fine Align”, but the PAD arrive at 96:50 (photo 7); so when we are requested to do V42 we don’t know the angles yet (ok, they can be read by hitting V42 on LGC page of PAMFD so the alignment can be...
  2. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    Small “issues” encountered so far in my Apollo 10 mission…I am using NASSP v1822, so as usual if what I am observing is due to my mistakes or outdated version my apologies. Day 1 1) When performing the “SPS Evasive Maneuver” the automatic checklist execution stop at “DV CG sw – LM/CSM”, the sw...
  3. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    Thank you Indy now everything fall into place. I made some further tests just for trials/learning ... so I got rid of the 525 alarm as you said, trying to be really "face on" to the CSM from the LM and it always worked (no need to uplink again the SVs). About the AGS causing the gimbal lock ...
  4. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    Thank you Indy for your kind reply :) . ok, sorry I was not clear. What I mean is/was the following: Each FDAI can show attitude w.r.t. the PGNS (IMU) or AGS (ASA) and I select from which source I want to see the attitude by the ATTITUDE MON sw; suppose I have FDAI 1 (CDR side) on PGNS and...
  5. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    Hi, thanks to reply, no problems I am very slow to carried out the mission, as too many real life issues who makes me feel very tired in the evening and hard to concentrate...can use only the weekends to really move on few hours into the missions :cry: :cry: wish all of you guys and NASSP were...
  6. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    Hi, I found the document " CSM rendezvous procedure - F Mission" and I saw that the UNDOCKING attitude was indeed 180-014-000, so everything makes more sense now, this for my Q1. For the others queries, I played a bit with the LM Attitude modes and I realized that I was wrong in reading out the...
  7. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    Hi to all, I slowly arrived to the AGS CALIBRATION and CSM-LM UNDOCKING steps (around 98h) but I have a bit of confusions accumulated so far with the CSM ATTITUDES, and later on (after undocking) with the LM ATTITUDES, so better I ask to clear all doubts. Q1) Looking at the CSM ATT before the...
  8. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    dear RCFLY, thanks for checking, and sorry for the delay, but I could not run the sim before due to real life problems . I don't know why I got the OPR lt on, but indeed I tried 2 - 3 times to run the same scenario I posted earlier and no problems, so it worked also for me, don't know what I did...
  9. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    Hi Indy, sorry to bother you again .. I tried all steps from 76h to 78h 30m ... I got the LOI-2 PAD at about 78:27:13 (the same I got this morning) and this time I did the uplink ... but the uplink stop and I got an OPR lt on ... as the CMC was "stacked" I just did V37E 00E ... I tried P30 but...
  10. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    just woke up and check quickly the forum...thank you as usual...happy to see that I didn't do anything wrong so far, and happy to see that even according the mission rules this situation might be happened also in reality, i just try to skip forward in time (bypassing all checklist and FP...
  11. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    dear Indy, thank you for your time. In the zip file some scenario files, photos of PAD I got (you should get the same running the scenaries) and my LOI-1 BURN status (in the doc file) i gave you the following scenarios: at 52h waiting for MCC-3 decision -> I got the MCC-3 scrubbed message at...
  12. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    Hi, just arrived safely into lunar parking orbit…around GET 76:00:00. But I am not happy, so before go on I would like to ask you something. After TLI I did only the MCC-2 and I didn’t trim the velocities (as in the FP) even if I end up with -0.5 fps in the DVc (N85 gave me -0.3, 0.0, +0.2...
  13. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    thanks Indy, maybe now the timing start making more sense: as I said the TLI MCC message came up at 2:39:22, if I remove the 18s it gives me 2:39:04 .... and now with more MCC messages received (just got the PAD for MCC-2 run) it seems to me that they always come at xx:xx:04 sec -> which is...
  14. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    :cheers: finished for day 1, put the crew to sleep and I will also go soon... but I would like to report a strange situation with the automatic MCC messages. I got the P37 TLI+4h abort PAD on time, and when I was supposed to get the P37 TLI+11h abort PAD I got instead the PADs for the TLI+25h...
  15. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    SORRY for the false alarm --- my fault: after drinking a coffee :coffee: and ri-checked saved scenarios I saw/realize that the "THC was on CW position" -> putting on neutral position solved the problems ->ashamed of me not seeing it before posting-and don't know why I put it there ... in a...
  16. T

    Apollo 10 with NASSP 8 beta rev 1822_issues

    Hi to everybody. I just started (few days ago) Apollo 10 mission and I was hoping to get close to the Moon before asking questions but apparently I was wrong :cry: I arrived to the point to extract the LM from the LV and get into the SPS Evasive mnvr attitude by V49E ... (the P30 PAD I...
  17. T

    New FDAI tex 1800x900

    dear "chrival" I am just a simple NASSP user but nevertheless I wanted to jump into this "developers only threat" to thank you (as well as "Lupus" before you) for this amazing FDAI ball ... it is really a piece of art , and I just downloaded both FDAI's (for CSM and LM) and put into the new...
  18. T

    FDAI textures

    I hope you "SW gurus" find a legal way out of this impasse as it is really a pity if we could not enjoy this peace of art soon in a new official NASSP release, and if it is already out there why re-invent the wheel .... but I know, I know, please don't get me wrong, legally there may be issues...
  19. T

    Apollo 9 - orbiter version 1771

    Hi, I would like to ask for some clarifications. Q1) During day 9 when I was supposed to carry out the “HGA test” at time 192:40:00 there was a yellow text instructing to “yaw right approx. 30 degrees out of plane north” and similarly at time 194:27:00 another yellow text instructing to “yaw...
  20. T

    Apollo 9 - orbiter version 1771

    Hi, Sorry for my late reply but I was occupied in other things … I did again some testing, about my previous Q1 and Q2, and I tried to point out what I am doing and observing; inside the 2 zip files some sceneries and some pdf in which I described in details the problems I faced for your...
Back
Top