Search results

I am referring to this TM procedure which was used to read, among other things, the systems test meter. Also no save was attached to the last post :P

Likely something missed in instrumentation or signal conditioning, those provide the power for those signals. Check the TM powerup procedure for anything missed.

5C-D and 6A-D? The test meter should work for those 6 injector temps, are you getting it to work for any other indications?

Yeah pretty much :) I dont remember if a "start time" of sorts was padloaded, but a fresh LGC start even under normal circumstances had a useless time, so it would be set via the CMC (and then a V55 used to correct the initial error by pressing enter on both at the same time on N65)

V55 has nothing to do with MCC access to the clock, so that comment is incorrect. V55 simply changes the current time by incrementing it to null any error between its current time and expected (correct) time. This was done because they couldn't uplink, but they could see the current LGC time and...

Yeah they didnt mention it to the crew, so I am guessing its implicit. So i would ship up a clock update with your state vector and REFSMMATs

I think the clock is stopped on the LGC when the cb is pulled, but I am not 100% sure. However, looking through the mission control transcripts, during the uplink of the REFSMMAT's and SV, they mention in passing "we have a good clock update" so that might indicate a clock update was shipped up...

I am looking into the clock now, I will report back. Also, regarding the checklist with the quad heater cb randomly in, it actually was correct due to it breaking before launch: 135:35:20 Haise: And, Jack, you can tell Owen Morris that the RCS System A/B 2 Quad 1 breaker is still nicely in...

Correct, I will elaborate in the next answer. The first one is an actual REFSMMAT based on the known alignment of the spacecraft (the one AGS is body axis aligned to) where the sun and earth were in the AOT. Then the desired REFSMMAT was a P30 REFSMMAT for MCC-7 burn. A 400+3 was performed to...

As I mentioned previously, we currently don't have a model for reverse power flow, so you cannot charge the CM bats using the LM power. You will have to manually edit the scenario to top them off.

Maybe? It would have been the helium pressure digital display. However our pressures are kind of cheaty at the moment, you still would have seen a change.

Following up, it looks like you didnt fire your descent start pyros when you initially powered up the DPS. That is why turning off the reg immediately is killing your DPS. <PYRO> Descent-Engine-Start-Pyros 0 0.0000

I'll give it a look shortly and report back As it was in real life as well! It was very anticlimactic in reality and since it was a corridor control, it really wasnt time critical or super dV critical (though they did shut down early to prevent overburn, which would necessitate flipping around...

Yep I would concur as well, it should warm up.

It shouldn't kill the engine right away, either that's something incorrect in the sim or a step was missed. You don't by change have a save before your PC+2 I can check?

Another thought did you press the LM with a cold CM cabin by chance?

I will defer this to @jalexb88

Is the other regulator open? What is your descent configuration at this point? And how did you initially pressurize the DPS and do the first burn? CO2 scrubber saturation is not modeled in NASSP, so you will always have a steady state CO2 level based on the crew on board. I had this issue as...

This was one of the pre saved missions? If so they probably are behind with respect to updates elsewhere in NASSP, so that is probably why your cabin temp was so low. Also, the suit temp valve redirects warm glycol flow, so if your glycol is still cool putting it to hot will only warm if the...

CSM ECS is a bit cheaty still. Cabin fans turn on the cabin heat heat exchangers right now. Suit temp is regulated from heat exchangers as well.