Don't worry about it Pluto, you'll always be a planet to me.
It's spherical?If it's spherical, and does not orbit another planet, it's a planet.!!
That's my story and I'm sticking with it. :beach:
It's spherical?![]()

It's spherical?![]()
Well, Pluto and Charon orbit each other, given that their barycentre lies somewhere in the space between them. Double dwarf planet IMHO.If it's spherical, and does not orbit another planet, it's a planet.!!
Well, Pluto and Charon orbit each other, given that their barycentre lies somewhere in the space between them. Double dwarf planet IMHO.
It is all semantics anyway. They are what they are.
In my opinion at least, Pluto never was a planet, it's a kuiper belt object.
simonpro said:The problem as I see it is that we like putting definate boundaries on things.
Stuff has to be either X or Y, black or white.
The real world, however, doesn't like things like that. It operates with shades of gray. We can all agree that Jupiter is a planet, so why can't Pluto just be a slightly less planetlike planet?
Just because we thought that the Earth was the center of the universe, did that make it true? No. I'm just saying that while we didn't know about the Kuiper belt when Pluto was discovered, we have known for about 15 years now, and it's high time we revisited the old notion of Pluto's planetary status. Fortunately, we've gone ahead and done that.At the time that pluto was discovered, we did not know about the Kuiper belt and TNOs. Pluto was the *only* thing that was out beyond the orbit of Neptune. So at that stage, it was pretty black and white that it was a planet. As we discovered more things out there that were like Pluto, we needed to rethink this.
:lol: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto#Neptune-avoiding_orbitThere is a saying. "everything that crosses orbits will eventually collide". Imagine Pluto crashing into NeptuneBy-by Pluto