Humor Random Comments Thread

So Paint.NET used up all of my RAM and nearly crashed my system just trying to load an image I downloaded from Wikipedia. :facepalm:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Messier_81_HST.jpg

22 620 x 15 200 pixels. Lordy!!

I manage to open photo with IrfanView for a couple of minutes waiting,small program for photo viewing end some editing option.
I have only 512 MB RAM.
But scrolling photo is only for those who have whole day waiting...
And you should keep open Task Manager to kill process if needed.
 
I tried the same on my work laptop. Paint.NET used all 4GB of my RAM as well, and then froze. My laptop was almost completely unresponsive for 5 minutes even after the program closed.

IS their something wrong with pain.net that it does that.
 
IS their something wrong with pain.net that it does that.
Not really; it's just a very big program.

I ended up also using IRFanView for it with success, but you're right...scrolling is a PITA.

Apparently the photograph won an award on the website for its quality...and a warning to anyone who dare open it with a web browser. :shifty:
 
Not really; it's just a very big program.

I ended up also using IRFanView for it with success, but you're right...scrolling is a PITA.

Apparently the photograph won an award on the website for its quality...and a warning to anyone who dare open it with a web browser. :shifty:

I had no problems opening it in Chrome. Granted, it took 5 minutes, but it opened fine. More than I can say for Paint.NET...
 
So Paint.NET used up all of my RAM and nearly crashed my system just trying to load an image I downloaded from Wikipedia. :facepalm:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Messier_81_HST.jpg

22 620 x 15 200 pixels. Lordy!!

Well, assuming that paint deals with everything in bmp format, regardless of the format on disk, that file would be about a gigabyte in memory even without overhead from the editing program.

Let me try it out with GIMP.

EDIT:

With GIMP (on Ubuntu 10.04) it uses about a gig of memory (out of three), takes maybe 30 seconds to load the file into memory, and then spends several minutes being unresponsive (only GIMP, the rest of the machine is somewhat slow and will sometimes be unresponsive for a half second or three) while it does something rather disk intensive. Then the file is available and can be scrolled and zoomed fairly easily. When the file is closed and GIMP remains open, about half a gigabyte of memory is leaked, this, of course, can be reclaimed by closing and restarting GIMP.



---------- Post added at 14:35 ---------- Previous post was at 14:19 ----------

The funny thing is, I wouldn't call roguelikes like Nethack combat-oriented. The primary sign that a game is combat oriented is when you can only die by enemy hands, thus stating that combat decisions are the only really important decisions you're ever going to make in the game. In Nethack, you can die from pretty much anything, including falling down the stairs because your backpack's too heavily packed. EVERY single decision in the game counts, every decision can make or break your neck. True, the skills are mostly combat oriented, but the gameplay in and of itself isn't, really.
If I get killed by a pink unicorn with a party hat and a clown on a bycicle because I drank an unknown potion that made me halucinate, that's just something you'll never see in a game that cares only about its combat (only God knows what it really was that offed me that day. It was the most hilarious death I ever expierienced).

The procedural nature of most roguelikes, combined with the complexity they usually bring with them, also makes for very great emergent gameplay (that's not procedural storytelling, it's when situations happen to fall together at random to produce an atmosphere, or even a story, of their own).

I've not played a lot of Nethack, mostly the *bands.

By the way, sorry I didn't send you the exe yet. I'm expieriencing severe system troubles at the moment, combined with a truckload of work. I'll send it as son as my system runs stable enough to justify re-installing visual studio. The current .exe seems to have a severe bug, I'll have to rebuild it...

OK. I was wondering a bit.
 
Last edited:
I have recently discovered that this upcoming April 12 will be the 50th anniversary of Gagarin's flight/30th anniversary of STS-1, and...

ON A TUESDAY
:hailprobe:
 
Random:
Snowed in only counts if you can't get out of your house:
000fff5h
 
I have recently discovered that this upcoming April 12 will be the 50th anniversary of Gagarin's flight/30th anniversary of STS-1, and...

ON A TUESDAY
:hailprobe:

so it's a super-historical day!

should we maybe add a calendar event?

:hailprobe:
 
What's so hard about physics?
Why did almost every author from Jules Verne to ones in the 60s got the gravity wrong?
Just stumbled across this, dated 1958:
07.jpg


Even now many people can't grasp the simple idea that you're falling at the same rate the rocket is.

The strangest thing of all, i also thought so myself a decade ago, but i can't remember what it was like!
 
Not even StarTrek screenwriters have any idea about what gravity is, so I wouldn't really expect micky mouse to do better...
 
What's so hard about physics?
Why did almost every author from Jules Verne to ones in the 60s got the gravity wrong?
Just stumbled across this, dated 1958:
07.jpg


Even now many people can't grasp the simple idea that you're falling at the same rate the rocket is.

The strangest thing of all, i also thought so myself a decade ago, but i can't remember what it was like!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::rofl:

If I get the time tomorrow, I can post a collection of wrong gravity and orbital mechanics in comics and Sci-fi...
 
So during parent-teacher interviews, my chemistry teacher thinks I need to work harder to understand the material/math but my calculus/advanced math teacher calls me a natural genius. Not sure what to make of that. :\
 
Jus considering the two statements, I'd say you have a good abstract grasp of mathematics, but some trouble at applying them to real-world problems... just my two cents.
 
Not even StarTrek screenwriters have any idea about what gravity is, so I wouldn't really expect micky mouse to do better...
Well, comic books can have some slack for completely imagined physics, but why can't they try to show stuff named proper properly?

Same comic, the rocket lands on the Moon using wings (ok, comic book), but moments later it's said that there is no air there, you know (WTF).
08.jpg

09.jpg


Consistency, basic consistency.

If I get the time tomorrow, I can post a collection of wrong gravity and orbital mechanics in comics and Sci-fi...
That would be welcome! I keep encountering them in completely random places.
 
Back
Top