Water Vapor On The Habitable-Zone Exoplanet K2-18b

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
37,603
Reaction score
2,324
Points
203
Location
Wolfsburg
Preferred Pronouns
Sire
Yes, it is the first time we have strong evidence of water on a exoplanet. BUT: It is not a sign of liquid water.
 

Topper

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
666
Reaction score
20
Points
33
When I was a child (I'm was born in 81), I remember that my teacher was saying us that it is unknown if other stars have planets and that we will never be able to proof such planets... And today, we are able to proof water in an atmothphere of a world which is 110 light years away from us. I know that the idea of this method is not new, but it is really strange to me that it works...
 

Linguofreak

Well-known member
Joined
May 10, 2008
Messages
5,029
Reaction score
1,269
Points
188
Location
Dallas, TX
Yes, it is the first time we have strong evidence of water on a exoplanet. BUT: It is not a sign of liquid water.

The direct spectroscopic signature only indicates vapor, but if I read the Arxiv paper correctly, there is evidence in the general transit light curve for a cloud layer, which would indicate condensation, and in any case the orbit of the planet is such that the existence of liquid water is a very good bet.

Now, what's more questionable, given the size of the planet, is the existence of liquid water as anything more than clouds and precipitation. It's quite likely that any "ocean" surface is deep enough in to be in the supercritical, not liquid regime.
 
Top