News Virgin Galactic's LauncherOne (orbital launch system)

Pipcard

mikusingularity
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
3,679
Reaction score
1
Points
63
Location
Negishima Space Center
(I just heard about this today, and nobody has mentioned it on the forums yet AFAIK)


(it's like Orbital's Pegasus)
 

IronRain

The One and Only (AFAIK)
Administrator
Moderator
Donator
Joined
Oct 11, 2009
Messages
3,391
Reaction score
202
Points
103
Location
Utrecht
Website
www.spaceflightnewsapi.net
Cosmic Girl takes LauncherOne on its first captive carry flight test

Virgin Orbit achieved another major milestone on Sunday, with LauncherOne taken on a captive carry test on Sunday. Carried under the wing of Cosmic Girl, a “flying launch pad” as described by the company, the duo enjoyed a successful first flight together, paving the way for the first launch that is set to take place in early 2019.

Cosmic Girl, a Boeing 747-400 (747-41R) series aircraft under then-registration number G-VWOW, undertook its first flight on 29 September 2001 and was delivered to Virgin Atlantic Airways on 31 October 2001.

Cosmic Girl – as she was named at the time of her delivery – spent 14 years in service with Virgin Atlantic Airways primarily servicing the company’s London to San Francisco via New York City route until 29 October 2015.
[...]







[ame="https://twitter.com/zia_aero/status/1064243560675823616"]Zia Aerospace on Twitter: "@Virgin_Orbit first flight with rocket under wing! Go Virgin!!!… "[/ame]

Sources:
- https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2018/11/cosmic-girl-launcherone-first-captive-carry-test/
- https://spaceflightnewsapi.net
 

zerofay32

Buckeye
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
470
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Location
Columbus, Ohio
It's kinda strange seeing a 747 with a missile under it's wing. :D

Interesting that they are using the 5th engine mount though. Makes sense.
 

MaverickSawyer

Acolyte of the Probe
Joined
Apr 11, 2011
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
3
Points
61
Location
Wichita
The what?

I'm not sure if they're still putting this in 747-8s, but earlier 747 variants have a fifth structural "hardpoint" between the inner left engine and the fuselage that can mount a spare engine. This was designed in due to the fact that, at the time of the launch of the 747, there were no cargo aircraft available to civilians that could airlift a whole high-bypass engine the size of the JT9 or the CF6. The hardpoint allowed a sister 747 to ferry in a replacement engine in the event of a failure while far from home, without having to wait weeks for one to arrive via ship.

Oddly enough, the prototype 747 found at the Museum of Flight in Seattle doesn't seem to have any external signs of this ever having been used during testing...
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
35,882
Reaction score
403
Points
173
Location
Langendernbach
I'm not sure if they're still putting this in 747-8s, but earlier 747 variants have a fifth structural "hardpoint" between the inner left engine and the fuselage that can mount a spare engine. This was designed in due to the fact that, at the time of the launch of the 747, there were no cargo aircraft available to civilians that could airlift a whole high-bypass engine the size of the JT9 or the CF6. The hardpoint allowed a sister 747 to ferry in a replacement engine in the event of a failure while far from home, without having to wait weeks for one to arrive via ship.

Oddly enough, the prototype 747 found at the Museum of Flight in Seattle doesn't seem to have any external signs of this ever having been used during testing...


AFAIR, they only have this in some 747 with Rolls-Royce engines, not sure why not in the others
 
Top