Ok TEI pad looked good, printed and uplinked it and updated my state vectors, did P52. After the burn looking at my (post TEI), orbit something seemed wrong (confirmed with MCC-5 (TEI +15h) needing a further 34 seconds of burn)
When going through P30 I noticed that the comp numbers had been updated (burn time chanaged by a few seconds, N48 ptrim/ytrim not 0, RPY 1/2 degree changed, DVC that I had set on the EMS needed increasing by 2.8 and the weight the comp had was a bit off from the pad). So, for all of these burn params, should I stick to what's on the printed pad or what had been re-calculated by the comp after the pad was uplinked) ?
Should MCC 5 be such a large burn ?
What should I see in orbit MFD directly after the TEI burn. When I did the TLI, i could see the correct pea and apa.
thx
When going through P30 I noticed that the comp numbers had been updated (burn time chanaged by a few seconds, N48 ptrim/ytrim not 0, RPY 1/2 degree changed, DVC that I had set on the EMS needed increasing by 2.8 and the weight the comp had was a bit off from the pad). So, for all of these burn params, should I stick to what's on the printed pad or what had been re-calculated by the comp after the pad was uplinked) ?
Should MCC 5 be such a large burn ?
What should I see in orbit MFD directly after the TEI burn. When I did the TLI, i could see the correct pea and apa.
thx