Do we see into the future in ORBITER?

francisdrake

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
722
Reaction score
35
Points
28
Website
francisdrakex.deviantart.com
I have my problems with relativistic effects and loss of causality when travelling faster than light. Orbiter - to my knowledge - has a Newtonian setup. I assume the lightspeed here is infinitly high.

So if I look at a distant planet, e.g. Jupiter, I can see the position where he is right now, not where he has been about one hour ago? (no light speed lag)

Does this influence spacecrafts on long distance travels?
Because they are pulled towards gravity sources where they are located right now, not where they had been some minutes ago, according to their distance divided by the speed of light? :hmm:
 

Thorsten

New member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
737
Reaction score
1
Points
0
You might want to sit down with a pen and some paper and work out how different the gravity vector to the current or to the lightspeed corrected position of a planet actually are.

Then of course you might consider the fact that gravity itself also propagates perturbations at lightspeed... :lol:
 

MontBlanc2012

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2017
Messages
129
Reaction score
5
Points
18
Does this influence spacecrafts on long distance travels?
Because they are pulled towards gravity sources where they are located right now, not where they had been some minutes ago, according to their distance divided by the speed of light?

Yes, the speed of gravity is finite. And so you might think that the direction of the gravitational force should not act towards the instantaneous position of the gravitating body. But this isn’t the case.

In analogy with a relativistic treatment of electromagnetism, there are counter-balancing force terms that offset the aberration induced by gravity’s finite speed. The net result is that gravity always acts towards the gravitating body’s instantaneous position rather than its time-retarded position - so long as the spacecraft moves with near constant velocity.

Of course, a spacecraft will accelerate slowly (in relativistic scales) and so there is a very slight aberration effect. This effect is very small and no larger than order c^-2 (~ 10^-17). Unless you are doing very precise astrometric work, you can ignore these corrections.

see for example https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9909087.pdf
 
Last edited:

francisdrake

Addon Developer
Addon Developer
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
722
Reaction score
35
Points
28
Website
francisdrakex.deviantart.com
Thanks for pointing me to the paper of "Aberration and the Speed of Gravity". I will read it and try to understand it. :)

That there shall exist forces offsetting the aberration of gravity sounds miraculous. Also one might argue, if gravitation is really an electromagnetic force? (Even if it behaves like one.)

Obviously that topic is more complex than I thought. I am aware that the difference between instantaneous position and time-retarded position is small, while the spacecraft is far away, and can be neglected if the spacecraft is close.
 

MontBlanc2012

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2017
Messages
129
Reaction score
5
Points
18
Yes, it does seem miraculous that the offsetting forces do appear in the equations of motion. I’m sure there is a clear explanation for this offset and I will rummage through the internet in search of one. If I am successful, I will post.
 

Shifty

Donator
Donator
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Location
San Diego
Do we know that as absolute (lightspeed was thought to be finite), as we has very little understanding how gravity works at present, besides the obvious attraction. ?

On the contrary, we have a great deal of understanding of how gravity works. Certainly there are still open questions, but gravity is very well defined, its mechanisms are largely explained, and its phenomena can be predicted with a high degree of accuracy in almost every situation.
 

Col_Klonk

New member
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
470
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
This here small Dot
On the contrary, we have a great deal of understanding of how gravity works. Certainly there are still open questions, but gravity is very well defined, its mechanisms are largely explained, and its phenomena can be predicted with a high degree of accuracy in almost every situation.

Yet, GUT is so far away ;)
We can predict, but we still don't know why/how !

Lightspeed is not constant ;)
 

Urwumpe

Not funny anymore
Addon Developer
Donator
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
35,644
Reaction score
137
Points
153
Location
Langendernbach
Lightspeed is not constant ;)


Sure, but vacuum speed of light is still a universal constant. And that is the velocity that really matters. Also propagation speed of light is maybe only a few centimeters per second, but its still finite.



Vacuum speed of light MIGHT be no constant. But thats a big MIGHT, since a lot of time as passed without finding the predicted phenomena.
 
Top