Register Blogs Orbinauts List Social Groups FAQ Projects Mark Forums Read

 Math & Physics Mathematical and physical problems of space flight and astronomy.

 11-01-2009, 08:28 PM #1 Arrowstar Probenaut Flow across a screen/radiator/etc Hello, I have a quick question in fluid mechanics I've been considering. Consider a pipe that has a screen, radiator, or some other flow impeding device contained within. Assume that the pipe is connecting two large tanks of constant pressures and that the radiator/screen is of negligible length in the direction of flow. Additionally, assume no major (frictional) losses in the pipe and that the flow is steady. Assuming the flow is incompressible, is there a velocity drop across the screen? I know there is a pressure drop, but should I expect to find that my fluid has physically slowed? My current reasoning suggests not: Conservation of mass must apply across the screen. If the area directly before the screen is identical to the area directly after the screen, and the fluid density is constant (incompressible assumption, above), then the velocity must be equal by the reduced form of conservation of mass: Where A is the cross section area of the pipe, v is the fluid velocity, and rho is the fluid density. If A and rho are constant, then the velocity at 1 (before the screen) must be equal to the velocity after the screen, 2. Does this reasoning fit with reality, or is there something I'm missing? Additionally, if there was a finite thickness screen (say it was an extended grille on a car), would you see an non-negligible velocity drop? Last edited by Arrowstar; 11-01-2009 at 08:47 PM.
 11-01-2009, 09:00 PM #2 RisingFury OBSP developer Well, if you put something inside the pipe, you're gonna reduce the surface area at that point...
 11-01-2009, 09:01 PM #3 pattersoncr Tutorial Publisher You're exactly right. Assuming the inlet and outlet piping have the same area, the velocity thru both will be the same. The velocity thru the restriction will be higher since the area is smaller. I don't understand your question at the end. Can you restate it?
 11-01-2009, 09:07 PM #4 Arrowstar Probenaut The question I was asking at the end was for a restriction which has a non-negligible length in the direction of the flow. So, say I have a pipe which immediately contracts to some smaller diameter, uses that smaller diameter for 10 meters, and then expands again immediately to the original diameter. You'll obviously have a loss at the inlets and exits, but, neglecting major losses, should the velocity of the fluid directly before the inlet be the same as the velocity of the fluid directly after the exit of the constriction?
 11-01-2009, 09:16 PM #5 pattersoncr Tutorial Publisher Nope same phenomenon. if Af = Ai then Vf = Vi the reduced diameter section will increase the overall flow resistance . One way this sort of system is frequently analyzed is with the "equivalent length method" each pipe fitting is treated as a certain length of open pipe, for example an elbow might offer the same flow resistance as 3 feet of open pipe whereas a globe valve might be 100ft. To determine the flow thru the system, you add up the equivelant length of all of the fittings and piping in the system.
 11-02-2009, 04:31 AM #6 JamesG Orbinaut One trick used in in-line catalytic converters for mitigating the flow loss from an obstruction is to expand the diameter of the flow just before the screen and then reducing the diameter shortly afterwards. The expansion slows the velocity of the gas and reduces the turbulence of passing thru the larger surface area of the obstruction, and then necking down the tube accellerates the flow back to its previous velocity (mostly, you are still going to have loss no matter what). That is in exhaust systems where the pressure waves and flow are very dynamic. Induction (intake) systems are simpler but can be tricky too. Many sport motorcycles use a complicated ram-air system of ducts and surge tanks to get intake air from the high pressure area at the nose of the bike around the fairing, thru the air filter, and into the carbs/throttle bodies with a minimum of disturbance or loss of pressure. Last edited by JamesG; 11-02-2009 at 10:50 AM.
 11-03-2009, 04:52 AM #7 pattersoncr Tutorial Publisher Flow of gasses, in witch rho (density) is not constant is very much more difficult to analyze than liquids. OP was about constant density.
 11-03-2009, 05:53 AM #8 JamesG Orbinaut It works the same for both. Its actually more straight forward for steadstate flows. You just don't get to take advantage of some of the tricks of pressure dynamics (ie; 2 stroke expansion chambers).

 Posting Rules BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Orbiter-Forum.com     Announcements     Meets & Greets Orbiter Space Flight Simulator     Orbiter Web Forum         OFMM         Orbiter Forum Space Station         Simpit Forum     General Questions & Help     MFD Questions & Help     Hardware & Software Help     Tutorials & Challenges     Orbiter SDK     Orbiter Visualization Project     Orbiter Beta » Orbiter Project Orbiter Addons     OrbitHangar Addons & Comments     Addons     Addon Development     Addon Requests     Addon Support & Bugs         Addon Developer Forums     Orbiter Lua Scripting Far Side of the Moon     Spaceflight News     Math & Physics     Astronomy & the Night Sky     Backyard Rocketry     Brighton Lounge     International Forum

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:41 PM.