Orbiter-Forum  

Go Back   Orbiter-Forum > Orbiter Space Flight Simulator > Orbiter Web Forum > Orbiter Forum Space Station
Register Blogs Orbinauts List Social Groups FAQ Projects Mark Forums Read

Orbiter Forum Space Station Project news & discussions for all OFSS versions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-11-2014, 04:04 PM   #46
jedidia
shoemaker without legs
 
jedidia's Avatar
Default

Quote:
P 0 0 -0.95 0 0 -1 0 1 0 IM
It's not aligned with the dock port propperly (which is at 0 0 -0.8). I'm not sure where exactly I built in the distance cut-off, but it's well possible that the attachment point isn't close enough to the receiving attachment point. anyways, things will look funny if the docking port and the attachment point aren't properly aligned, because then the position of the integrated module will be different from the position of the docked module...
jedidia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 06:00 PM   #47
ADSWNJ
Scientist
 
ADSWNJ's Avatar
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Castor View Post
 Another doubt that just popped up in my mind (please forgive me if it's a stupid one) :

Should the missions be a single try sort of thing ? What I mean is that the if the pilot botches something up in the mission, he can either try and fix it or make an abort landing. In the latter case, future missions would attempt to resolve the problem.
Totally agree. The problem I was addressing is where you designate a flight to somebody, that then does not complete in a reasonable time, and gradually people lose interest in the project.

My suggestion is to have an "ensemble" of flights for a specific mission (to coin a meteorology models term), where the primary pilot's scenario is the master one if delivered in the time limit, else the reserved pilot, else take one of the ensembles.

This way - you can have reasonable certainty that the construction will complete inside a predictable time - e.g. worst case # missions times 10 days each.
ADSWNJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
Old 05-11-2014, 11:18 PM   #48
ThaGuy
Orbinaut
Default

It's funny downloaded IMS weeks ago and have had great fun with it totally ignorant of what it can do,(I've been basically building a big piece of eye candy) I also use the Themis-A and HCLV exclusively with an orbital tug
I've been trying to build a seamless scenario consisting of approximately 12 launches with 16 payloads but keep getting a ctd when switching focus to the next launch vehicle.Am wasting time by trying this or must it be many separate scenarios?
Attached Files
File Type: log Orbiter.log (5.0 KB, 5 views)
ThaGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2014, 04:39 AM   #49
Castor
Orbinaut
 
Castor's Avatar
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jedidia View Post
 It's not aligned with the dock port propperly (which is at 0 0 -0.8). I'm not sure where exactly I built in the distance cut-off, but it's well possible that the attachment point isn't close enough to the receiving attachment point. anyways, things will look funny if the docking port and the attachment point aren't properly aligned, because then the position of the integrated module will be different from the position of the docked module...
I still can't get the port to integrate with the rest of the station.
Castor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2014, 04:55 PM   #50
jedidia
shoemaker without legs
 
jedidia's Avatar
Default

I'll take a closer look when I get around to it. It really shouldn't be a problem, but I'm currently not familiar enough with things to figure out what it is without laying my hands on it. Rest assured however that it can be done, so you can count that module in. Just need to find a bit of quiet time to see what's wrong.

---------- Post added at 04:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:23 AM ----------

Ok, easy as pie. Kind of what I expected, but of course I couldn't verify without the actual mesh at hand.

The mesh is in reverse alignement, which means that what was dockport 0 was on the side where the soyuz is supposed to go. You could have integrated it if you docked it the other way around, but of course that's no use. So here's a config with the dockports defined in reverse order and the attachment point in the right place:

Code:
; ======================================
; Standard parameters
; ======================================
MeshName =DockingAdapterCBMtoSoyuz
Mass = 300
Size = 1.9
Inertia = 0.2 0.2 0.2

; === Docking ports ===
BEGIN_DOCKLIST
  0 0 0.50    0  0 1    0  1  0
  0 0 -0.80   0  0 -1    0  1  0
END_DOCKLIST

BEGIN_ATTACHMENT
P  0 0 0.50    0  0 1    0  1  0 IM
P 0 0 0 	0 0 1	1 0 0  XRCARGO
END_ATTACHMENT

; ======================================
; IMS specific parameters
; ======================================
ModuleType = Truss
PreserveDocks = 1

; ======================================
; XR Cargo Specifications
; ======================================
XRPayloadEnabled = true;
Description = IMS Soyuz Docking Adapter
Dimensions = 2 2 2 
AttachmentPointIndex = 1
jedidia is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
Old 05-13-2014, 04:59 AM   #51
Castor
Orbinaut
 
Castor's Avatar
Default

Thanks a lot, jedidia !

---------------------------------------------------------------

Another doubt:

Should the CTV be launched with its usual Ariane combination or can we use the Themis-A ?

---------- Post added at 04:59 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:11 AM ----------

I have made a new mission plan now comprising of nine missions (excluding the manned ones), also incorporating some tug missions (as proposed by Loru) for those who would like a challenge. Hopefully, I can put up a mission summary soon. As for the timeline, I'm still working on it...
Castor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 06:43 AM   #52
PhantomCruiser
Wanderer
 
PhantomCruiser's Avatar

Default

For my own VSA I managed to put up an operable (but not nearly complete) station in 30 days (actually 35). But, I was using multiple launch sites (KSC, Sagan, and SRC Polygon).
Also using multiple vechicles (shuttle from KSC, Buran from SRC, Energia from Sagan, Jason/Eagle and Orion from KSC (different launchpads, Jason/Eagle has it's own at CCAFB).
The reasoning for this was multiple crews at multiple sites for a high volume launch scedule early in the program. People weren't stepping over one another at KSC trying to do everything from one particular infrastructure.
PhantomCruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 06:51 AM   #53
Castor
Orbinaut
 
Castor's Avatar
Default

@ PhantomCruiser Earlier you mentioned some SSBB textures done by 4throck, but I can't find them anywhere. Could you please post a link to it ?
Castor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 07:28 AM   #54
PhantomCruiser
Wanderer
 
PhantomCruiser's Avatar

Default

I've been looking for them myself. I thought they were in the IMS development thread but I can't seem to find it.

I've dug through parts of the screenshot thread, but there's a lot of posts to sift through.
PhantomCruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 11:52 AM   #55
Interceptor
Orbinaut
 
Interceptor's Avatar
Default

Hello Castor,and PhantomCruiser,the pages you are looking for 4throcks IMS stuff is on page 383,384,and,385 of the screenshots page.

Last edited by Interceptor; 05-14-2014 at 03:17 AM.
Interceptor is online now   Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
Old 05-13-2014, 03:21 PM   #56
PhantomCruiser
Wanderer
 
PhantomCruiser's Avatar

Default

Starting with this one
http://www.orbiter-forum.com/showthr...postcount=5734
PhantomCruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
Old 05-13-2014, 04:57 PM   #57
Castor
Orbinaut
 
Castor's Avatar
Default

The mission list is finalized, all the combinations have also been tested out. Now all that remains is the timings for the missions from launch to landing.

---------- Post added at 04:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:54 PM ----------

Just one more thing :

Quote:
Originally Posted by Castor View Post
 Should the CTV be launched with its usual Ariane combination or can we use the Themis-A ?

Last edited by Castor; 05-14-2014 at 04:47 AM. Reason: Fixed typos
Castor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2014, 05:59 PM   #58
PhantomCruiser
Wanderer
 
PhantomCruiser's Avatar

Default

How does it look on the Themis? It was "built" for the Ariane, but if it looks right/works right on a Themis I don't see why it couldn't be used.
PhantomCruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 02:45 AM   #59
Castor
Orbinaut
 
Castor's Avatar
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhantomCruiser View Post
 How does it look on the Themis? It was "built" for the Ariane, but if it looks right/works right on a Themis I don't see why it couldn't be used.
It works out just fine, and the second stage of the rocket has just about enough delta-v to insert the craft into a 300x300 km orbit. No LES though.

---------- Post added May 14th, 2014 at 07:46 AM ---------- Previous post was May 13th, 2014 at 06:01 PM ----------

Here is a mission summary with a timeline. All times have been approximated only to a day so that launch windows are freely available.

Legend
1) GC : Latest time by which all goals must be completed
2) Launch : Time of launch
3) Landing : Time of landing. Landing must take place not earlier than the GC date and not later than this date.
4) Goal : SB stands for station building, CT stands for crew transfer
5) WIN : Wideawake International
6) CSSC : Carl Sagan Space Center
7) Basic skill : Minimum piloting skills required to undertake the mission

Flt#VehicleLaunchGCLandingGoalMannedLaunch/Landing siteBasic skill
1Themis-A2 Oct 20236 Oct 2023N/ASBNoCSSCBasic orbital maneuvers
2XR518 Oct 202323 Oct 202325 Oct 2023SBYesWIN/WINRendezvous, Docking, Stack management, RMS manipulation
3XR55 Jan 202414 Jan 202416 Jan 2024SBYesWIN/CSSCRendezvous, Docking, Stack management, RMS manipulation
4XR23 Feb 20245 Feb 20248 Feb 2024SBYesCSSC/CSSCRendezvous, Docking, EVA
5HCLV-25 Feb 20247 Feb 2024N/ASBNoCSSCRendezvous, Docking
6HCLV-4S3 Mar 20245 Mar 2024N/ASBNoCSSCRendezvous, Stack maneuver/Orbital tugging, Docking
7XR55 Mar 20246 Mar 202412 Mar 2024SBYesWIN/WINRendezvous, Docking, Stack management, RMS manipulation
8HCLV-4S23 Mar 202425 Mar 2024N/ASBNoCSSCRendezvous, Stack maneuver/Orbital tugging, Docking, Reentry
9XR510 June 202416 June 2024 22 June 2024SBYesWIN/CSSCRendezvous, Docking, Stack management, RMS manipulation
10XR510 Sep 202416 Sep 202418 Sep 2014SBYesWIN/WINRendezvous, Docking, Stack management, RMS manipulation
11CTV2 Oct 202410 Oct 202412 Oct 2024CTYesCSSC/CSSCRendezvous, Docking
12XR24 Nov 202415 Nov 202416 Nov 2024CTYesCSSC/WINRendezvous, Docking

Detailed information about mission payloads

Feedback is appreciated.

---------- Post added at 05:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:46 AM ----------

Launching and landing sites updated.

---------- Post added May 15th, 2014 at 02:45 AM ---------- Previous post was May 14th, 2014 at 05:40 PM ----------

Since most of the preliminary planning is done, should I go ahead and start a new thread for a pilot roll call ?

Last edited by Castor; 05-15-2014 at 04:17 PM. Reason: Minor corrections
Castor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 04:17 AM   #60
PhantomCruiser
Wanderer
 
PhantomCruiser's Avatar

Default

I'd hold off until you have your matrix full populated. That way the pilot will know what is expected of him (construction, Pax/Pony, etc).

Additionally, the pilot would know his cargo manifest.

Pax/Pony = Personnel and material Pax=people, Pony is a throwback to the Pony Express
PhantomCruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  Orbiter-Forum > Orbiter Space Flight Simulator > Orbiter Web Forum > Orbiter Forum Space Station


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13 PM.

Quick Links Need Help?


About Us | Rules & Guidelines | TOS Policy | Privacy Policy

Orbiter-Forum is hosted at Orbithangar.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2007 - 2017, Orbiter-Forum.com. All rights reserved.